www.paladium.net
www.paladium.net service markSM

Arizona Landscape PhotoARIZONA GOVERNMENT OFFICERS' HOME ADDRESSES

  1. Introduction
    2009nov19

    1. Campaign Finance

      Financial Reporting, Campaign Contributor Search Web page permits search by contributor's name. Government officers often contribute. The Web page leads to PDF files which include contributors' home addresses.

    2. Officer Database

      There is a database: Arizona Government Officres' Name, Job Title, Agency, Pay.

      We supply some examples of that Web site's information below under "correction".

    3. an Arizona night

      This is an approximate account of a few events one night in a jail in Arizona. The jail was a government jail which housed prisoners of a for-profit corporation which transported prisoners for various governments.

      A prisoner asked to get medical treatment. He was brought to a nurse in the jail. He told the nurse that he had an itchy rash on his groin. The nurse asked, "Are there pustules?" He said that he did not know what pustule means. She asked if there were pus boils. He said no. She handed him a tube of ointment. The visit was over. He left, then submitted a grievance form comlaining that he had received incompetent medical treatment. The prisoner wanted to receive competent medcial treatment for the rash. The nurse should at least have looked at the rash. If the rash had been on the prisoner's elbow, the nurse would have looked at it. If she's too shy to look at a man's groin, she shouldn't be allowed to work in a jail. More or less, this was the grievance.

      If the prisoner had been a free person going to a doctor in that part of Arizona for that rash, the doctor would at least have looked at it. Furthermore, the nurse did not schedule a follow-up visit. For example, the nurse did not say, "The ointment should cure you in three or four days. If you have the rash five days from now, come back."

      To respond to the prisoner's grievance form, the prisoner was brought to the person supervising the entire jail at that time. The supervisor read the grievance form and allowed the prisoner to add any remarks he wanted. The supervisor then said that he (the supervisor) was incompetent to evaluate medical care provided by the nurse. Therefore, the prisoner lost the grievance. No other medical care was provided.

      We think that the jail's management has a duty to provide reasonable medical care to prisoners. This requires having impartial evaluation of the care actually provided to the prisoners. If you hire someone to paint your house, that doesn't mean he did the job right. If you hire someone to provide medical care to your prisoners, that doesn't mean he did the job right. If a jail's management is unable to find out (either directly or through an independent contractor) whether the jail's medical staff provides reasonable medical care to prisoners, the jail should be closed. If a jail is closed, its prisoners should either be freed (an unlikely possibility) or transferred to a jail which provides reasonable medical care.

      It is wrong to treat an itchy rash neither looking at it nor scheduling a follow-up visit. We mention this because terrible medical care is common in American jails. The attorney general of Arizona does not manage the jail in the account above.

      The account above applies to Arizona. We are under the impression that, in California, a state agency tries to find out if local jails meet minimal, state, quality standards. We don't know if that agency tries to find out if prisoners get reasonable medical care.

      As far as we know, there is a federal law that a prisoner may not sue his jail for a problem if the jail had a grievance system that met certain requirements, and the prisoner had not previously filed a grievance using that grievance system. We think that there's an exception for grievances which would have been futile to file. In other words, the prisoner may sue a jail with a grievance system even if the prisoner had not filed a grievance about the subject matter of the suit if he proves that the grievance would have been futile, as far as we know. This raises a question of which grievances are futile. The discussion below is based on a few kinds of information (for example: reading copies of grievances submited by prisoners, and friendly communciations with C.O.s and prisoners about the processing of prisoners' grievances).

      In most (not all) jails, it is futile to file a grievance:

      1. because the jail's conduct is illegal.
        1. In most jails, the person who decides the grievance (often the employee whose conduct was complained about, or his boss) do not know the law and have no way to find out.

          The grievance-deciding employee may have no formal education after high school. Furthermore, he guess-decides (whether the complained-of conduct is illegal) off the top of his head. Even a lawyer would insist on doing legal research before deciding the issue.

          The following account is approximately accurate. A prisoner once submitted a grievance (either as a letter or as a greivance form) in a small, county jail. He was brought to the sheriff, in the sheriff's office. ("I'm internal affairs.") The prisoner explained the grievance, which claimed that the jail did something illegal to him. The grievance cited specific provisions of state law. The sheriff said, without checking those provisions or any other law, that he had been a federal marshal earlier in his career, that federal prisoners did not have that right, and that prisoners in his state had fewer rights than federal prisoners. The prisoner said that, in general, prisoners in his state had fewer rights than federal prisoners but that generalization was irrelevant. The prisoner explained to the sheriff that prisoners in that state had one right that federal prisoners supposedly lack, the right that the prisoner's grievance was based on. The sheriff admitted that the prisoner's logic was right (in the sense that it was wrong for the sheriff to conclude that state prisoners lacked that right merely because federal prisoners supposedly lacked that right). The sheriff said that he would look into the matter, then seems to have done nothing. The sheriff did not know the law. There was no lawyer present during the discussion and his ignorant remarks strongly suggested that he had not conferred with a lawyer about the grievance prior to the discussion. It seems extremely unlikely that anyone on the staff of that small, poor jail ever confers with a lawyer merely to respond to a prisoner's grievance.

          A jail employee, when deciding a grievance, will never conclude that a widespread practice is illegal. The employee will conclude that the widespread practice must be legal because it is widespread. An employee might even irrelevantly say to a prisoner who had submitted a grievance, "Office Smith isn't the only one who does this. All the C.O.s do it that way." It is futile to point out that the illegality is even worse if done to many prisoner-victims or if done by many employees.

        2. A jail employee could be punished for admiting that the jail did something illegal, especially if many prisoners were harmed or one prisoner was harmed much.

      2. i f the grievance is because the jail did not provide reasonable medical care.

        The non-medical staff will neither decide a medical grievance nor consult an impartial person to decide if the grievance is valid. The medical staff, when responding to a grievance, will never (as far as we know) talk to the prisoner who submitted it. Also, regardless of how clear the medical misconduct, the medical staff seems to loath admiting in writing that it misttreated a prisoner.

        Among non-medical staff, it is common to talk to the prisoner as part of processing his grievance. He may have additional facts or analysis that he did not put on his grievance form. Also, if he loses, the non-medical staff may want to tell him face-to-face why he lost. When medical staff handle a grievance, the prisoner is not talked to (neither as part of handling the grievance, nor to tell him why he lost if he lost).

        In general, medical grievances are processed much more slowly than other grievances.

        A grievance is signed by the employee who decides it. Usually, high-ranking, non-medical employees do not want to be bothered processing grievances. Non-medical grievances usually are signed by a low-ranking employee (maybe a C.O. or his boss). Medical employees seem to regard a grievance as a potentially dangerous document, much too important to be signed by a low-ranking employee. Medical grievances usually are signed by a high-ranking, medical employee.

      3. if granting the grievance would damage a jail employee's career, embarass him, or humiliate him.

        By the way, jail employees are routinely told which prisoner filed a grievance against them even whent the prisoner's identity is irrelevant. This routine practice helps felonious revenge.

      4. if the grievance's existence would anger a prisoner who is scheduled to soon testify for the prosecution in a criminal case which is important to the prosecution.

      Subject to the futility policies listed above, staff is most likely to grant a grievance:

      1. as a favor to the prisoner (an act of kindness).
      2. if the prisoner complains that he is unfairly being treated worse than other prisoners.

      Sometimes, C.O.s tell a prisoner that submiting grievances is futile (for example, more or less: "There is no such thing as prisoner rights." and "I can wipe my ass with grievances.") We do not know what effect such remarks have on a prisoner's legal duty to exhaust his administrative remedies (by submiting a grievance form) before suing the jail.

  2. Arpaio 2009mar17

    Joseph M. "Joe" Arpaio, born in Springfield, Massachusetts, is the politically powerful sheriff of Maricopa County, Arizona. He is a controversial, elected officer of a county government.

    JOSEPH M ARPAIO born 1932-06-14 lived in Scottsdale AZ.

    There is an article on "Ripoff Report" Web page about Joe Arpaio, submitted 7/4/2004, modified 7/19/2006, by Jim of Peoria, Arizona. The article seems to claim that there is lack of accounting for some finances. According to our understanding of the article, Arpaio has bought real estate together with Ava Arpaio (about whom we provide campaign contribution information which we got from the Arizona Secretary of State's Web site, below). Sheriff Joseph Arpaio seems to have accumulated much wealth while on a government salary.

    office address
    100 W. Washinton, Ste. 1900
    Phoenix, Arizona 85383
    

    We don't know where he lives. Below are addresses of two of the parcels he seems to have bought. He does not necessarily own them now or live in them.

    1. Arpaio, 12808 North Via Del Sol, Fountain Hills, AZ 85268

    2. Arpaio, 6648 Sharon Dr Scottsdale, AZ 85254

    Through the Web, the Arizona Secretary of State provides the world with information about campaign contributor Ava J. Arpaio:
    	ARPAIO AVA J
    	6648 E Sharon Dr, Scottsdale, AZ 85254
    	08/09/2000 $256.00 Name:
    	Address: Cash
    	$256.00
    	HOMEMAKEROccupation:
    
    	Arpaio, Ava
    	9999 E.  99th St., Scottsdale, AZ 99999
    	12/18/2007 $25.00 Name:
    	Address: Cash
    	$25.00
    	retired, N/AOccupation:
    	holiday party [contribution for Christmas party?].
    
    Look at contributor Ava's address for 2007. As far as we know: in some jurisdictions, it may be illegal, even criminal, to provide false campaign finance information. We are not expert in Arizona campaign finance law. We don't know if Ava lives at either of the two addresses supplied for her above, addresses we got from the Arizona Secreatry of State's Web site.

    Joseph is a government officer. It sometimes can be illegal for a government officer to personally profit from inside information. For example, if a government officer is entrusted by the government with confidential government information to enable him to do his government job, and if he then personally profits because he uses that that information for his personal benefit, he may possibly have done a crime and a tort in some jurisdictions. Remedies may sometimes include having him disgorge, to the government, all of the income and other benefit he received. Many people have heard about this (personal profit resulting from use of inside information) in conjunction with negotiable securities and the SEC but it can sometimes apply elsewhere also. Consider a hypothetical government officer who wants to buy real estate and therefore gets confidential government information (criminal records, driver records, motor vehicle registartion records, perhaps) about a potential seller to decide whether to buy from him. That would be an improper use of the information because it would be for his own benefit. An investigator could find the names of those who sold the subject (the government officer who's being investigated) real estate, then see if there had been inquiries of governmental databases (about those sellers) at about the time the subject bought (or agreed to buy) from the sellers. If the subject were a landlord who had leased real estate to his tenants, one similarly could find out if there had been inquiries of governmental databases (about those tenants) about the time that the subject leased to those tenants. You get the idea. Some people make much money in real estate because they know much about whom they do business with, and they know much because they improperly get information from the government. All resulting income and other benefit (for example, rental income and sales income) should be disgorged to the government. Furthermore, it sometimes may be appropriate to confiscate instrumentalities of crime such as computer systems and databases used to criminally obtain confidential information from the government.

    By the way, consider a government officer who gets information for free that members of the public must buy. For example, the officer wants to buy real estate. Anyone can buy the driver record of a potential seller but the officer gets the record for free while he's on the job. The officer examines the information he got for free, concludes that it is wise to buy from that potential seller, then buys. Later, the officer sells. In our opinion, all of the sales income, or at least the sales profit, should be paid to the government.

    Also by the way: sometimes, before a government officer buys real estate, he investigates the neighbors, while he's on the job, to see whom he'll be next to if he buys. He investigates the neighbors by getting government information which is confidential, free to him, or both. The more one knows about real estate opportunities, the more likley one is to profit.

    Consider a hypothetical officer, involved in a real estate transaction for his own benefit, who improperly investigates, in the manner described above, the other party to the transaction. For example, an officer-buyer investigates a seller by implicitly pretendiung that he needs the information to do his government work. The sale occurs. The buyer now has the realty and the seller now has the money. We feel that what happened is unfair to, among others, the seller and others who wanted to buy, and that rescission should be available as a remedy. Maybe what happened in the hypothetical transaction just above is undue influence, which can justify rescission. The officer may have a special relationship with the seller, the relationship which enabled the officer to get the inforamtion about the seller. Furthermore maybe, the officer, because he pretended that getting the seller-related information was part of his job, should be estopped to deny that he had a special relationship with the seller. Undue influence cases sometimes involve doctors, nurses, and lawyers. We haven't studied this and we don't happen to know of any undue influence cases involving a government officer. Maybe the above transaction involves fraud which consists of concealment of a material fact; namely, the buyer's illegal investigation of the seller. This is a speculative, off-the-cuff paragraph, not the fruit of extensive research.

    If you'ree interested in this, talk with a lawyer about consequences of using inside information in real estate transactions. We guess that state law usually is more important than federal law in that context.

    We do not know if Arpaio engaged in the activities described above. In our opinion, it would be appropriate to legally investigate Arpaio, his subordinates, and other government officers in Maricopa County (for example, regarding use of confidential county and state databases to investigate real estate opportunities).

  3. Capas 2004oct21.
    Cochise County sheriff's spokeswoman Carol Capas may possibly be: CAROL CAPAS, age 40, 117 WOLFE ST, SIERRA VISTA AZ 85635

  4. Correction
    2009nov19

    1. Department of Corrections
      2009nov19

      Most officers below are medical, dental, and pharmaceutical. The physicians ("PHYSCN") make little money for physicians. Why don't they work where physicians are paid more? In any event, we got the infomation below from Arizona Government Officres' Name, Job Title, Agency, Pay in November 2009.

      1. ADU-TUTU, MICHAEL DENTAL PROG MGR Corrections, Dept of $151,049 2009nov22

        MICHAEL ADU-TUTU 7338 CARIBBEAN LN PEORIA, AZ 85381

        MICHAEL ADU-TUTU 9235 74TH DR PEORIA, AZ 85345

        MICHAEL ADU-TUTU 303 BASELINE RD PHOENIX, AZ 85040 (602) 268-1655

      2. AHEE, FERRIS DENTIST Corrections, Dept of $114,999
      3. ALATHMAN, RABIHA PHARMACIST POOL Corrections, Dept of $128,544 2009nov22

        FERRIS D AHEE Born Jun 1958, 4460 HAVEN LN TUCSON, Pima Ciunty, AZ 85712 (520) 327-4499

        FERRIS D AHEE Born Nov 1931, 8180 RIVENOAK DR TUCSON, AZ 85715 (520) 296-3371

      4. ALLEN, JACK A. PHARMACIST POOL Corrections, Dept of $128,544
      5. AUSTIN, CYRUS F. DENTIST SPV Corrections, Dept of $127,874
      6. BAIK, JAMES S. DENTIST Corrections, Dept of $109,850
      7. BARCKLAY, KAREN B. PHYSCN SPV Corrections, Dept of $149,350
      8. BARTOS, IVAN C. DC REGNL OPS ADMR Corrections, Dept of $99,328
      9. BELCOURT, CRAIG L. PHYSCN Corrections, Dept of $149,350
      10. BELZER, ANN A. DC CORRL CLNCL PHARMACIST Corrections, Dept of $96,460
      11. BOOTHBY, LESLIE P. PHARMACY PROG MGR Corrections, Dept of $102,639
      12. BRESLOW, MICHAEL F. PHYSCN 3 Corrections, Dept of $181,949
      13. BUCKNER, LISA J. CHARGE PHARMACIST Corrections, Dept of $96,460
      14. BURKE, AUDREY A. DC DPTY DIV DIR Corrections, Dept of $99,328
      15. CLEARY, MICHAEL F. PSYCHIATRIST Corrections, Dept of $169,301
      16. COONS, JESSE R. PHYSCN SPV Corrections, Dept of $151,925
      17. CRANE JR, WILLIAM A. PHYSCN POOL Corrections, Dept of $214,240
      18. CREWS, TRACY L. PSY SPV Corrections, Dept of $180,250
      19. CURRY, JOANNE M. DENTIST POOL Corrections, Dept of $182,104
      20. DAVIS, JANECE M. DENTIST SPV Corrections, Dept of $120,150
      21. DELOS SANTOS, JOSE DENTIST Corrections, Dept of $106,760
      22. DIMAANO, ANTONIO R. PHYSCN 3 Corrections, Dept of $123,869
      23. ENCISO, VICENTE O. PHYSCN Corrections, Dept of $149,350
      24. FIGUEROA, REYNALDO A. PHYSCN Corrections, Dept of $141,625
      25. FLANAGAN, CHARLES F. DC DPTY DIV DIR Corrections, Dept of $100,000
      26. FREDRICKSON, JACK C. DENTIST Corrections, Dept of $109,850
      27. GOLDSMITH, CHARLES D. DC DIV DIR Corrections, Dept of $111,000
      28. GOMEZ, EDWARD DENTIST Corrections, Dept of $109,850
      29. GRANT, GARY B. DENTIST SPV Corrections, Dept of $123,240
      30. HALLAHAN, JOHN R. DC DIV DIR Corrections, Dept of $111,000
      31. HANSTAD, BRIAN T. DENTIST SPV Corrections, Dept of $115,000
      32. HARRISON, JESSICA A. PSYCHIATRIST Corrections, Dept of $166,499
      33. HERRERA, MICHAEL A. PHYSCN POOL Corrections, Dept of $214,240
      34. JARROLD, GARY G. CHARGE PHARMACIST Corrections, Dept of $96,460
      35. JENDUSA, DAVID J. PSYCHIATRIST Corrections, Dept of $169,301
      36. JOLLEY, THEODORE B. DC REGNL FACILITY HLTH ADMR Corrections, Dept of $97,335
      37. JOSEPH, GREGORY M. DENTIST Corrections, Dept of $112,939
      38. KANTER, BRUCE E. PHYSCN Corrections, Dept of $149,350
      39. KREBS, KARL T. DENTIST Corrections, Dept of $110,879
      40. KULP, ALAN K. DENTIST Corrections, Dept of $113,650
      41. LAWRENCE, BRADNER J. DENTIST POOL Corrections, Dept of $182,104
      42. LESAC, MICHAEL C. PHYSCN Corrections, Dept of $149,350
      43. LEWIS, KEVIN S. PHYSCN Corrections, Dept of $149,350
      44. LIPPERT, JOHANNA C. DC NURSE PRACTITIONER Corrections, Dept of $99,240
      45. LLOYD-HILLS, ALLANA S. CHARGE PHARMACIST Corrections, Dept of $96,460
      46. LOCKHART, JOHN E. PHYSCN Corrections, Dept of $149,350
      47. LONGFELLOW, THOMAS R. PHYSCN Corrections, Dept of $149,050
      48. LUCAS, PHILIP E. DENTIST Corrections, Dept of $109,850
      49. LUDENS, DOUGLAS R. DENTIST Corrections, Dept of $112,939
      50. MACABUHAY, RONOLFO S. PHYSCN SPV Corrections, Dept of $154,500
      51. MARKLEY, DONA M. DC DPTY DIR Corrections, Dept of $123,000
      52. MILAZZO, MICHAEL J. PHYSCN 3 Corrections, Dept of $134,083
      53. MONTGOMERY, JAMES G. PHARMACIST POOL Corrections, Dept of $128,544
      54. PALMER, DALE L. PHYSCN SPV Corrections, Dept of $154,500
      55. PATEL DDS, MEETA M. DENTIST Corrections, Dept of $105,729
      56. PAULLEY, IRMA I. DENTIST SPV Corrections, Dept of $123,240
      57. PETERSEN, THOMAS D. CHARGE PHARMACIST Corrections, Dept of $96,460
      58. PHAN, GIANG T. PHYSCN POOL Corrections, Dept of $214,240
      59. POLANCO, PRIDO PHYSCN SPV Corrections, Dept of $149,350
      60. READ, STANLEY PHARMACIST POOL Corrections, Dept of $128,544
      61. RECUBER, MICHAEL DENTIST POOL Corrections, Dept of $182,104
      62. RICARD DDS, RAPHAEL P. DENTIST Corrections, Dept of $105,730
      63. RICE, KENNETH F. DENTIST Corrections, Dept of $109,850
      64. RIHANEK, CAROLYN J. DENTIST Corrections, Dept of $114,999
      65. ROGERS, SUSAN L. DC GENERAL COUNSEL Corrections, Dept of $100,000
      66. ROMBERGER, ALEX E. DENTIST Corrections, Dept of $109,850
      67. ROWE, RICHARD H. PHYSCN SPV Corrections, Dept of $151,925
      68. RYAN JR, CHARLES L. DC DIV DIR Corrections, Dept of $125,000
      69. SALWITZ, MICHAEL T. PHYSCN SPV Corrections, Dept of $151,925
      70. SARDER, OMAR F. DENTIST Corrections, Dept of $110,879
      71. SCHREINER, TRACY A. AD HLTH SVCS DIV Corrections, Dept of $135,000
      72. SHARP, JEFFREY A. PHYSCN 3 Corrections, Dept of $134,234
      73. SHIPMAN, GREGORY L. DENTIST SPV Corrections, Dept of $121,179
      74. SONBERG-DAVENPORT, BILLI DC REGNL OPS ADMR Corrections, Dept of $99,000
      75. STEIN DMD, CHRISTIAN E. DENTIST SPV Corrections, Dept of $120,150
      76. STEINHAUSER, GALE PHYSCN Corrections, Dept of $151,925
      77. TAYLOR, DIANNE C. PHARMACIST POOL Corrections, Dept of $128,544
      78. TAYLOR, WANDA A. PSY SPV Corrections, Dept of $180,250
      79. TEE, CONCHITA A. PHYSCN Corrections, Dept of $146,775
      80. VINLUAN, EDUARDO L. PHYSCN Corrections, Dept of $146,775
      81. WAND, MARILYN M. CHARGE PHARMACIST Corrections, Dept of $96,460
      82. WEEKLY, CARLOS L. DENTIST SPV Corrections, Dept of $123,240
      83. WHITE, ROBERT A. PHYSCN SPV Corrections, Dept of $154,500
      84. WHITNEY, HAROLD E. PHYSCN Corrections, Dept of $149,350
      85. WILLIAMS, DEBORAH A. DENTIST SPV Corrections, Dept of $120,150
      86. WOHLER, JOHN PHYSCN Corrections, Dept of $151,925
      87. WOOLSEY, WADE Q. DC CONTRACT BEDS OPS ADMR Corrections, Dept of $99,000
      88. WRIGHT, JOAN L. CHARGE PHARMACIST Corrections, Dept of $96,460
      89. ZISCHKE, CREE DC DIV DIR Corrections, Dept of $130,000

    2. MASELLA

      21 January 2004,

      ACPOA (Arizona Correctional Peace Officers Association) president is Sgt. JOSEPH M. "JOE" MASELLA, age 37, 10358 E CALYPSO AVE, MESA AZ 85208

    3. Schriro

      14 August 2004, Department of Corrections Director: Dora B. Schriro, photo: DORA SCHRIRO, PHOENIX AZ 85012 or 85018, phone (602)

  5. ECKSTEIN 2008feb20

    Paul Eckstein: court officer (attorney at law), Q1/2007, Christopher Dodd, 2,300. 22 W HAYWARD AVE, Phoexnix AZ

  6. Phoenix NASCAR photo 1992Esquer

    Attorney-General of Arizona spokeswoman Andrea Esquer.
    2006oct22

    1. ESQUER

      ANDREA M ESQUER Born 1966, 1720 PALMCROFT DR, 05/20/2003, TEMPE, AZ 85282

      This property may have been owned by her relatives.
      Parcel #: 133-31-185
      Subdivision Name: HUGHES ACRES 7
      MCR #: 11642 Lot #: 904
      Property Address: 1720 E PALMCROFT DR, TEMPE 85282
      Property Description: HUGHES ACRES 7
      Section Township Range: 26 1N 4E

    2. ANDREA M ESQUER, 2039 RICE DR, TEMPE, AZ 85283. She may recently have owned this property.

      Parcel #: 305-01-027 Subdivision Name: KNOELL TEMPE 6
      MCR #: 15744 Lot #: 1075
      Property Address: 2039 E RICE DR, TEMPE 85283
      Property Description: KNOELL TEMPE UNIT 6
      Section Township Range: 1 1S 4E Associated Parcel:
      Owner: ESQUER ANDREA M
      Mailing Address: 2039 E RICE DR, TEMPE AZ 85283 USA
      Deed #: 060241688, Sales Price: n/a, Deed Date: 2/22/2006, Sales Date: n/a.
      Property Use Code: 0131 0131 0131
      Tax Area Code: 031608 031608 031608
      Square Feet of Living Space: 1,652
      Improvement Quality Grade: R-3
      Lot Square Footage: 7,619
      Market Area/Neighborhood: 02/007
      Covered Parking: 2 Car Garage
      Unique Location Characteristics: None
      Construction Year: 1974
      Pool Square Footage:
      Number of Patios: 1
      Bath Fixtures: 6
      Patio Type: Slab
      Cooling: Refrigeration
      Exterior Walls: 8" Painted Block
      Heating: Yes
      Roof Type: Asphalt Shingle
      Physical Condition: Average
      real estate, tax year 2006, Open - CTX $1,277.40
      Fidelity National Title warranty deed notarized 14 February 2006 by Leslie [illegible middle initial] Henley. Many jurisdictions will not record a deed if the notarization is illegible. (The rejected deed is mailed back to the filer with a brief note explaining why the deed was rejected.) In our opinion, if one looks at the notary seal alone (which is on page two of the deed, according to URL http://recorder.maricopa.gov/recdocdata/UnofficialDocs.asp?rec=20060241688&pg=2&cls=RecorderDocuments&suf=&sar=UnOfficial&bid=&naf=1&bk=0&rec2=&pgs=&map=&bdt=01/01/1900&edt=10/22/2006&nm=&set=20&cde=&lnk=0&Pages=3), the notary's name is illegible, thus rendering the notary seal inadequate to support recordation. Even if one looks at everything on page two, the notary's middle initial is illegible. One should not have to guess or suppose what the middle initial is. In our opinion, that illegibility may posibly disqualify the deed from being accepted for recordation by many of America's recorders. It is conceivable that Arizona state or Maricopa county may have different or relatively low standards for deciding what's acceptable for recordation. We guess that it's conceivable that, when the Maricopa county recorder's staff saw who the grantee was (namely, the AG's spokeswoman), a decision was made not to antagonize her by rejecting her deed. We are not expert in Arizona recordation law.

    3. ANDREA M ESQUER Born 1966, 5366 COUNTRY CLUB WAY, 08/12/2003, TEMPE, AZ 85283.

      This property may recently have been owned by her relatives.

      Parcel #: 301-01-723, Subdivision Name: COLONIA DEL SUR UNIT 4 AMD, MCR #: 15043 Lot #: 198.
      Property Address: 5366 S COUNTRY CLUB WY, TEMPE 85283
      Property Description: COLONIA DEL SUR UNIT FOUR AMD.

  7. Go Daddy
    1. Introduction 2010apr12 GD (The Go Daddy Group Inc.) is not a govrnmetn agency. It is a government-created corporation which employs court officers (attorneys). GD's officers generously contribute to political committees. DOMAINSBYPROXY.COM Host domainsbyproxy.com Organization GoDaddy.com ISP GoDaddy.com AS Number AS26496 15111 N. Hayden Rd., Ste 160, PMB 353 Scottsdale, Arizona 85260 United States
    2. Acencio, Hector ACENCIO, HECTOR SCOTTSDALE AZ 85260 11/16/2009 1000.00 GODADDY.COM, INC./MANAGER 10990245396 ADELMAN HECTOR J ACENCIO Born 1967 1141 SANDSTONE CT GILBERT, AZ 85296 HECTOR J ACENCIO Born 1967 7675 SOFTWIND DR SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
    3. Adelman Warren J. Adelman President and COO 47 WARREN J ADELMAN Born 1963 20568 93RD PL SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
    4. CILKE, KIMBERLY PHOENIX, AZ 85024 GO DADDY/LAWYER SHADEGG, JOHN B. VIA JOHN SHADEGGS FRIENDS 06/26/2009 250.00 29934278702 KIMBERLY D CILKE 1970-06-11 Oklahoma City OK Ms. Kimberly D J Cilke Firm/Organization: GoDaddy.com Inc Mailing Address: 14455 N Hayden Rd Ste 219 Scottsdale, AZ 85260-6993 Telephone: 480-624-2512 Fax: 480-624-2513 County: Maricopa Law School: U Of OK Admitted to Practice: 1997 Admitted to AZ Bar: October 18, 1997 Jurisdiction: Arizona Professional Liability Insurance: Not required to report Status: Active Date Activity Detail 01/28/06 Active Membership Status Change 02/09/05 Inactive Membership Status Change KIMBERLY J CILKE Born 1970 20920 80TH AVE PEORIA, AZ 85382 (623) 362-2206 K CILKE 70TH ST SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85254 (480) 368-90nn
    5. EDE, CAMILLE SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260 GO DADDY/PRINCIPAL GODADDY.COM INC., PAC 12/23/2009 1000.00 10990245446 Camille R Ede 4022 E Alan Ln Phoenix, AZ 85028 (602) 996-3379 about 37
    6. Jack Haslup QA Go Daddy Updated Q3/2008 Barack Obama $1,005 5122 N 31ST WAY UNIT 213 Phoenix AZ Jack Haslup QA Go Daddy Updated Q1/2008 Barack Obama $737 5122 N 31ST WAY Phoenix AZ (480) 502-2821 JACK E HASLUP Born 1933 17320 77TH WAY SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255 (480) 502-5791 JACK E HASLUP 7325 REIM DR SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85250 JACK E HASLUP 155 3RD ST TEMPE, AZ 85281
    7. JOHNSTON, MARTHA WASHINGTON, DC 20008 GO DADDY/GOVERNMENT RELATIONS SMITH, GORDON HAROLD VIA FRIENDS OF GORDON SMITH 02/29/2008 1000.00 28020152911 JOHNSTON, MARTHA WASHINGTON, DC 20008 GO DADDY/LEGAL ADVISOR GODADDY.COM INC., PAC 03/19/2008 5000.00 28931217056 03/06/2009 1000.00 29934395586 MARTHA R JOHNSTON 2945 ALBEMARLE ST NW WASHINGTON, DC 20008 MARTHA R JOHNSTON 4535 WARREN ST NW WASHINGTON, DC 20016 (202) 362-0846 (202) 362-5603 Martha R. Johnston, (Zip code: 20008) $500 to GOOD FUND, THE on 07/26/06 Martha Johnston Donation of $5,000 to Godaddy.com Inc Pac Martha Johnston Updated Q2/2007 $5,000 Washington DC Donation to Godaddy.com Inc Pac Martha Johnston Donation of $1,000 to Friends Of Gordon Smith Martha Johnston Government Relations Go Daddy Updated Q1/2008 $1,000 Washington DC Donation to Friends Of Gordon Smith Martha Johnston Donation of $1,000 to Mcconnell Senate Committee '08 Martha Johnston Director Of Govt Relati Godaddy.com Updated Q4/2007 $1,000 Washington DC Donation to Mcconnell Senate Committee '08
    8. JONES, CHRISTINE PHOENIX, AZ 85045 GO DADDY GROUP, INC./ATTORNEY DORGAN, BYRON L VIA FRIENDS OF BYRON DORGAN 03/24/2008 2300.00 28020143351 01/15/2009 2300.00 29020143487 JONES, CHRISTINE PHOENIX, AZ 85045 GO DADDY/GENERAL COUNSEL GODADDY.COM INC., PAC 04/30/2007 5000.00 27931014016 04/07/2008 5000.00 28991010498 02/20/2009 5000.00 29934395587 SMITH, GORDON HAROLD VIA FRIENDS OF GORDON SMITH 02/29/2008 2300.00 28020152912 Court Officwe; Attorney Information Ms. Christine N Jones Firm/Organization: GoDaddy.com Inc Mailing Address: 14455 N Hayden Rd Ste 219 Scottsdale, AZ 85260-6993 County: MARICOPA Telephone: 480-505-8812 Fax: 480-624-2546 Practice Information Section Membership: E-Commerce & Technology Law Law School: WHITTIER Admitted to Practice: 1997 Admitted to AZ Bar: October 18, 1997 Practice Area: Litigation Jurisdiction: ARIZONA, FEDERAL COURT Professional Liability Insurance: No Status: Active CHRISTINE N JONES Born 1968 3943 FRUITVALE AVE GILBERT, AZ 85233 (480) 279-6659 (480) 892-6086 CHRISTINE N JONES Born 1968 440 CACTUS WREN ST GILBERT, AZ 85296 (480) 892-6086 CHRISTINE N JONES Born 1968 1545 SALTSAGE DR PHOENIX, AZ 85045 (480) 892-6086 CHRISTINE N JONES 3200 CENTRAL AVE PHOENIX, AZ 85012 (602) 240-2952
    9. KELLER, GREGORY LAVEEN, AZ 85339 GO DADDY/COMPUTER SOFTWARE DNC SERVICES CORPORATION/DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE 10/18/2008 250.00 28993704231 Gregory A Keller 5413 W Fremont Rd Laveen, AZ 85339 (602) 795-2624 about 57 Maybe GREGORY KELLER 1953-10-10 Chandler AZ
    10. KELLEY, Meredith Committee ID: C00432328 GODADDY.COM INC., PAC 14455 North Hayden Road Suite 219 Scottsdale, AZ 85260 Treasurer Name: Kelley, Meredith Committee Designation: U (UNAUTHORIZED) Committee Type: QUALIFIED NON-PARTY MEREDITH KELLEY 15555 FRANK LLOYD WRIGHT BLVD SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260 (480) 767-1084\ MEREDITH KELLEY 9550 THUNDERBIRD RD SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260 (480) 391-1381
    11. LEWIS, KELLY SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260 GO DADDY GROUP, INC./ASSISTANT GE DORGAN, BYRON L VIA FRIENDS OF BYRON DORGAN 03/24/2008 500.00 28020143355 01/15/2009 1000.00 29020143410 KELLY W LEWIS 3200 CENTRAL AVE PHOENIX, AZ 85012 (602) 234-5870 KELLY W LEWIS Born 1962 10348 SHARON DR SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260 (480) 451-6002
    12. OWEN, BRAD SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260 GO DADDY/PRINCIPAL GODADDY.COM INC., PAC 05/02/2007 300.00 27931014017 Brad J Owen, Scottsdale, AZ BRAD R OWEN Born 1975 8736 E FOUNTAIN ST MESA, AZ 85207 (480) 358-1351 BRAD OWEN 1001 MINTON DR TEMPE, AZ 85282
    13. PARSONS, RENEE (related to Robert Parsons?) SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85262 (Robert Parsons seems to have been in this zip code.) GO DADDY/EVENT PLANNER BONO MACK, MARY VIA MARY BONO MACK COMMITTEE 12/17/2009 2400.00 10990214339 12/17/2009 2400.00 10990214340 Renee M Parsons, 31, Phoenix, AZ Renee M Parsons, 31, Glendale, AZ Renee Parsons, Quartzsite, AZ
    14. Robert R. (Bob) Parsons, CPA Founder, Chairman, and CEO 61 related to GD's Renee Parsons? ROBERT R PARSONS 14000 94TH ST SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260 ROBERT R PARSONS Born 1950 34245 BOULDERS PKWY SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85262 (Renee Parsons seems to have been in this zip code.) ROBERT R PARSONS Born 1950 10032 PALO BREA DR SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85262 (480) 575-0412 ROBERT R PARSONS Born Aug 1971 10032 PALO BREA DR SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85262
    15. Barbara J. "Barb" Rechterman Chief Marketing Officer and Executive Vice President 46 BARBARA J RECHTERMAN Born 1964 5413 DESERT VISTA TRL CAVE CREEK, AZ 85331 (480) 515-3604 BARBARA J RECHTERMAN Born 1964 36526 24TH ST PHOENIX, AZ 85086 (480) 595-9637
    16. ROTY, RICHARD CAVE CREEK, AZ 85331 GO DADDY/DEVELOPER MANAGER GODADDY.COM INC., PAC 03/02/2009 250.00 29934395621 07/06/2009 250.00 10990245582 09/03/2009 250.00 10990245584 RICHARD L ROTY 1938-01-03 Bolingbrook IL (480) 488-3580 RICHARD L ROTY Born 1938 14716 BUTTONWOOD D SUN CITY WEST, AZ 85375 RICHARD L ROTY Born 1938 14716 BUTTONWOOD DR SUN CITY WEST, AZ 85375 (623) 584-0551
    17. Neil G. Warner Chief Information Security Officer and President of Domains by Proxy 52 NEIL G WARNER Born 1957 420 2ND AVE APACHE JUNCTION, AZ 85219 (480) 983-7085 NEIL G WARNER Born 1957 2581 MEGAN ST CHANDLER, AZ 85224 (602) 821-7718 NEIL G WARNER 3145 PHEASANT PL CHINO VALLEY, AZ 86323 (928) 583-5048 NEIL G WARNER Born 1957 22507 173RD PL GILBERT, AZ 85233 (480) 988-9268
    18. WOMACK, STEWART SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85254 GO DADDY GROUP, INC./ATTORNEY DORGAN, BYRON L VIA FRIENDS OF BYRON DORGAN 03/24/2008 500.00 28020143376 STEWART J WOMACK Born 1962 16236 51ST ST SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85254 (602) 485-5945 STEWART J WOMACK Born May 1962 5201 EVANS DR SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85254 (602) 275-7561 (602) 485-5945 Government Officer: Arizona Attorney Information Stewart J Womack Firm/Organization: GoDaddy.com Inc Mailing Address: 14455 N Hayden Rd Ste 219 Scottsdale, AZ 85260-6993 County: MARICOPA Telephone: 480-505-8832 Fax: 480-624-2578 Section Membership: E-Commerce & Technology Law, Intellectual Property Law Law School: U OF A Admitted to Practice: 1994 Admitted to AZ Bar: October 22, 1994 Practice Area: Intellectual Property Jurisdiction: ARIZONA Professional Liability Insurance: Not required to report Status: Active
    19. Zimmerman Michael J. Zimmerman EVP and CFO MICHAEL J ZIMMERMAN Born Dec 1970 15338 92ND WAY SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260 MICHAEL J ZIMMERMAN Born Dec 1970 6203 VIA ESTRELLA AVE PARADISE VALLEY, AZ 85253 (480) 675-0671 MICHAEL J ZIMMERMAN Born May 1943 6868 PONTIAC DR GLENDALE, AZ 85308 (623) 376-6880 (623) 376-8944 (623) 566-5593

  8. Goddard

    attorney general Samuel Pearson "Terry" Goddard, III. 2006oct22.

    Childhood in Tuscon. His father was a governor. Terry was mayor of Phoenix. He is married to Monica Lee. They have a son.

    TERRY GODDARD Born Sep 1948, 503 PORTLAND ST, PHOENIX (Maricopa County?), AZ 85003 (602) 253-0497.

    Parcel #: 111-32-010
    Subdivision Name: KENILWORTH BLKS 1-6
    MCR #: 839 Lot #: 10
    Property Address: 503 W PORTLAND ST, PHOENIX 85003
    Property Description: KENILWORTH
    Section Township Range: 5 1N 3E
    Owner: GODDARD SAMUEL P III/[and another]
    Mailing Address: 503 W PORTLAND ST
    PHOENIX AZ 85003 USA
    Deed #: 040744231
    Deed Date: 6/29/2004, 2-page warranty deed of Western Title Agency of Arizona, notarized 18 June 2004 by Lisa M. Bond. By that deed, he gave the parcel, which he'd owned as his separate property, to himself and his wife as community property. We don't why the transfer was done in June 2004 rather than at another time.
    Legal Class: 6 6 3
    Assessment Ratio: 5.0% 5.0% 10.0%
    Property Use Code: 0131 0131 0131
    Tax Area Code: 011300 011300 011300
    real estate tax 2006 Open - CTX $1,652.08
    Square Feet of Living Space: 2,984
    Improvement Quality Grade: R-3
    Lot Square Footage: 10,875
    Covered Parking: 2 Car Garage
    Unique Location Characteristics: None
    Construction Year: 1916 (It's an old house.)
    Pool Square Footage:
    Number of Patios: 2
    Bath Fixtures: 8
    Patio Type: Covered
    Cooling: Refrigeration
    Exterior Walls: Brick
    Heating: Yes
    Roof Type: Asphalt Shingle
    Physical Condition: Average

    By the way, Goddard's Phoenix is the city referred to in Glen Campbell's song, "By the Time I Get to Phoenix".

    By the time I get to Phoenix she'll be rising She'll find the note I left hangin' on her door She'll laugh when she reads the part that says I'm leavin' 'Cause I've left that girl so many times before

  9. Pima County
    2010may19
    1. Dupnik

      June-July 2003, Arizona

      Clarence W. Dupnik, Sheriff of Pima County of Arizona, may posibly be:
      67 years old
      4311 East Homes Street
      Tuscon AZ 85711
      photo

    2. LaWall

      Barbara E. LaWall, 55 years old, county attorney of Pima county of Arizona, may possibly live at:
      32 North Stone Avenue
      Tuscon AZ 85701
      (520) 299-4317

    3. Perkins

      5 Sep. 2003, PIMA County, Arizona

      The Arizona prosecutor known as Deputy Pima County Attorney Philip R. Perkins (Arizona state bar number 010089) may possibly be:
      Philip R. Perkins
      7450 North San Anna Drive
      Tuscon, AZ 85704
      (520) 297-2894

  10. Prescott, AZ - 3/2002

    two police officers
    Sgt. Tim Fletcher and Officer Rikki Klotzbach

    Officer Klotzbach posibly may live at:
    2980 Cisco Drive South
    Lake Havasu City, AZ 86403
    Phone: 928-855-2553

    Officer Fletcher may posibly be:
    Tim Fletcher
    24415 N 38th Terrace
    Glendale, AZ 85310
    Phone: 623-587-8614

    Incidentally, a 911 phone call which we guess is unrelated to the officers and to Prescott involved a twelve-year old girl who was out of control.

  11. Thomas 2009mar17

    Maricopa County Attorney Andrew Thomas

    Andrew P Thomas
    Maricopa County Attorney
    301 W Jefferson
    Phoenix, AZ 85003-2191
    

    ANDREW P THOMAS, Born 1966, 4408 NISBET RD PHOENIX, AZ 85032 (602) 485-1489

  12. Tohono O'odham Police Department (TOPD) officers

    11 March 2004
    Eric O'dell, ERIC J ODELL, about age 31, 7300 N MONA LISA RD, TUCSON AZ 85741

    George Traviola, GEORGE P TRAVIOLA, 2740 W MARMORA PL, TUCSON AZ 85713

    Richard Saunders, age 30, 5467 E PLACITA DEL MESQUITE, TUCSON AZ 85712, (520) 327-2410

    WEIERS 2009mar17

  13. Rep. Jerry Weiers, Republican, District 12, Arizona House of Representatives

    He and his brother, Speaker Jim Weiers, simultaneously have been in the Arizona House of Representatives.

    Below is FAA information, available to the entire world from the FAA World Wide Web site, about his aircraft and his airman certificate.

    Aircraft
    N2523G is Assigned
    
    Aircraft Description
    Serial Number	   	51823
    Type Registration	   	Individual
    Manufacturer Name 		CESSNA
    Certificate Issue Date 		06/11/2002
    Model		182B
    Status 		Valid
    Type Aircraft 		Fixed Wing Single-Engine  (in our opinion, dangerous)
    Type Engine		Reciprocating
    Pending Number Change		None
    Dealer		No
    Date Change Authorized		None
    Mode S Code 		50460664
    MFR Year 		1959
    Fractional Owner 		NO
    
    Registered Owner
    Name 	    	WEIERS JERRY P
    Street 		5025 N 81ST DR
    City 		GLENDALE
    State 	ARIZONA
    Zip Code 	    85303-6010
    County 		MARICOPA
    Country 		UNITED STATES
    
    Airworthiness
    Engine Manufacturer 	  	CONT MOTOR
    Classification 	Standard
    Engine Model 	  	O-470 SERIES
    Category
    A/W Date 	02/13/1959
    
    ...
    
    Weiers's aircraft is above.
    His airman certificate is below.
    
    ...
    
    A394148600JERRY PAUL                    WEIERS                        5025 N 81ST DR                                                    GLENDALE         AZ85303-6010USA               WP3052008052010
    A394148601PP        P/ASEL
    (We guess that, in "P/ASEL", "P" means pilot of, and "SEL" means single engine license.  Maybe "A" means fixed wing aircraft.)
    

    JERRY P WEIERS Born 1957, 5025 81ST DR GLENDALE, AZ 85303


IMPORTANT NOTICE

This paladium.net Web site and all of its contents are provided as is, solely for informational purposes, and without warranty. There is no express warranty, no implied warranty, and no warranty of fitness for an intended purpose. We are not liable for informational errors or incompleteness. We have no duty to update anything. Verify all statements and claims. Carefully read and consider many sources of information, analysis, and opinion. Please inform us of each and every falsehood in this Web site. We own all email messsages and other communications to us. This Web site contains parody and humor. Our linking to a Web site is not approval or endorsement. This Web site, which is not exclusively about government officers, identifies some people who never were government officers. Our discussions and editorials do not necessarily apply to anyone named or identified in this Web site.






Home Addresses of People Most of Whom Are Current or Former Government Officers

LINKS

publicity about this site search this site an idea research tips
world's governments main page previous page next page

Referrer URL


map to CIA headquarters on Colonial Farm Road in McLean
link to home page