www.paladium.net

HOME ADDRESSES OF GOVERNMENT OFFICERS IN CALIFORNIA

Court Officers A-K

Alexander
court officer (attorney at law) Katherine Violet Alexander, 2006apr13
1. address
  Bar Number 59070; Address 11600 Summit Wood Ct, Los Altos Hills, CA 94022; Phone Number (650) 948-5567; Fax Number (650) 948-7596.
  She has been a teacher in a government university.
  KATHARINE V ALEXANDER , 11600 SUMMIT WOOD CT (on a dead end street near Tepa Way, south of Foothill College; 04/06/2004), LOS ALTOS, Santa Clara county, CA 94022-4500. (650) 948-5567.
2. discussion
  1. introduction
    She may no longer be practicing law.
    To try to persuade a client into lying to the court that he was guilty of a felony, she said that, in exchange for such a statement from him, she could arrange for him to promptly get out of jail (but on probation instead). She implied that the amount of time incarcerated was importanat. The truth is that, for most defendants with no previous criminal record who are convicted of a felony for the first time (for example, the client to whom she spoke), at least 99% of the harm resulting from that felony conviction occurs after incarcertion ends. As bad for the defendant as jail and prison are, they pale in comparison to the harm (resulting from being convicted of a felony) that most defendants experience after incarceration (harm imposed by a variety of sources). For most people (with a clean criminal record prior to prosecution) who are being prosecuted for a felony for the first time, it is misleading to say to them that, if they say in court that they are guilty of the alleged crime, that their lawyer can negotiate an arrangement by which their incarceration will end soon after that statement. The statement to the defendantt was an attempt to mislead because, for someone (with a clean ecord prior to being prosecuted) who is convicted of a felony for the fist time, jail and prison are a trivial part of the punishment that results from the conviction. Nevertheless, this statement, said as part of an attempt to mislead, is what Katherine Alexander said to at least one client. For the kind of defendant described above, the prosecutor offers a trivial incentive to the defendant to say he's guilty, because only a trivial part of the punishment consists of the incarceration. If Alexander had been truthful to her client, she would have told the client that he should insist on trial because, among other reasons, there was only a trivial advantage to his saying that he was guilty. She unsuccessfully tried to betray the client.
    She was insubordinate. She flagrantly refused and defied some of her fundamental obligations as the client's agent; for example, she made explcitly clear that she (not the client) decided whether there would be a trial. A client complained about this insubordination to the court. As a result, she was replaced (for that client only) by a different public defender, and someone from the public defender's office apologized to the client for her misconduct.
    After she was replaced, she chatted in a courtroom with another lawyer about the client of whom she had been replaced as lawyer. The other lawyer in the chatting had no involvement with the client. In the chatting, which was just social small talk between two lawyers, Alexander disclosed privileged, confidential, attorney-client information that was unethical for her to disclose. Her manner of speech and choice of words showed that her disclosure was not done negligently but was done in contemptuous disregard of her duty of confidentiality to her former client, whom she looked at as she chatted.
  2. prison versus jail
    Few criminal defense lawyers in Santa Clara county are qualified to offer an opinion as to whether it is better for a specific defendant to be in Santa Clara county jail or California state prison. However, this does not stop the unethical ones among them from offering an opinion to clients. Prison might be better for one client but jail might be better for another. Often a Santa Clara county public defender tells his client that a proposed plea bargain carries with it a benefit to the client: the client will do his time in county jail rather than in state prison.
    In general, prisoners find it much harder to be a prisoner in Santa Clara county jail than in California's state prisons. There are reasons for this.
    1. The state system has dozens of prisons. Many of those prisons specialize in a kind of prisoner. For example, the most obstreperous prisoners go to Pelican Bay. There are maximum security, medium security, and minimum security prisons. The less security, the nicer the prisoners living there tend to be to each other. Prisoners are evaluated when they enter the prison system. Evaluations later are changed for some prisones. Prisoners usually are sent to a prison appropriate to their evaluation. Although Santa Clara county also sorts prisoners, the county's sorting isn't done nearly as well. As a result, regarding prisoners who generally obey the rules (for example, they rarely start fights with other prisoners), a state prisoner is far more likely to be compatible with his fellow state prisoners (those whom he meets while a state prisoner) than is a Santa Clara county prisoners likely to be compatible with his fellow prisoners.
    2. In general, the state prison staff is less bad to prisoners than is the Santa Clara county staff. We could give many examples of this although, in the interest of brevity, we shall give only a few. Elsewhere in this website, we describe how the jail treats chess. By contrast, one prison had a chess tournament and gave chess sets as prizes to the winners. The county jail has a small, law library. There is no library staff to help the prisoners. In one state prison, there is a true library: circulation room with a periodicals section and circulation staff, reference room (including a law reference library) with reference staff, a supervisor of the staff, and a real librarian running the whole library. In county jail, visitors (for example, friends and relatives) speak to a prisoner through a phone while looking at him through glass. In some prisons, visiting arrangements are much nicer (for example, there are conjugal visits). Muslim prisoners in at least some state prisons can get halal food. As far as we know, the county jail does not provide halal food. In county jail, the prisoners wear prisoner uniforms that look like prisoner unforms. In some prisons, prisoners wear dungarees and blue work shirts (about what some of the prisoners would wear if they were free). In other prisons, prisoners are allowed to wear their own clothing. Prison C.O.s are more likely to do favors for prisoners, and are less likely to be malicious to prisoners, than are county C.O.s (although there is an immense variety of C.O.s in prison and jail). Maybe Pelican Bay prison's staff is generally worse to prisoners than Santa Clara county jail's staff.
      In California state prison, if a prisoner works, he gets paid. A prison prisoner who works gets out of prison early, he gets paid a tiny amount of money (about a dime an hour), and he may get small, fringe benefits closely related to the work he does. As far as we know, in Santa Clara county jail, some prisoners (including some who have not been convicted of a crime) work for free (for example: doing janitorial work such as washing walls, sinks, toilets, doors, and windows; and sweeping and mopping floors) because they are compelled to. Forcing someone to work can be slavery (admittedly a dramatic word), which as far as we know can be a felony unless lawfully imposed on someone convicted of a crime as part of his court-ordered punishment. Some janitorial work by jail prisoners is done for free. Some janitorial work is done for a pittance (for example: extra food and privileges). For example, some jail windows are cleaned by prisoners who get paid nothing. Other jail windows are cleaned by prisoners who get paid with food (for example, an extra meal tray of food) and other privileges. Paradoxically, those county jail prisoners who work for free have no choice; those who get a pittance are invited to work for that pittance.
      Consider two prisoner-employees doing identical work: one in state prison, the other in Santa Clara county jail. The one in prison is covered by worker's compensation. The one in county jail isn't, as far as we know.
      Although we are not expert in prisoner rights, we guess that the right to jail a prisoner (because he cannot afford to pay bail, for example) does not include the right to enslave the prisoner. The government may jail him but not force him to work in jail, we guess. By the way, police sometimes may briefly detain someone for questioning, a procedure which is not an arrest. We are under the impression, which may be wrong, that a brief detention may last up to twenty-four hours. We guess that police have no right to force a detained person to wash walls or toilets while he's detained. As far as we know, a court may require a criminal defendnat to be present in a courthouse for hearings of his case but may not force him to do custodial work or other work in the courthouse. Santa Clara county is too cheap to hire free people to voluntarily do janitorial work in jail. The jail staff uses its power to force any prisoners it wants to work, including unconvicted prisoners, to work. The right to jail a person does not include the right to force him to work (much less, to work for free) in the jail, as far as we know.
      In any event, the difference in treatment of prisoner-employees is an example of the better treatment received by state prison prisoners compoared to Santa Clara county jail prisoners.
    3. investigation of carceral crime
      We've never done a systematic study of this topic to compare California state prisons to Santa Clara county jail. Below, we report two incidents.
      Once, in a room in a California state prison, a prisoner supposedly was severely beaten by other prisoners. An employee investigated. He seemingly questioned every person was, or might have been, in the room in that time. Each interrogation was done in a room in which the only two people present were the questioner and the questionee. The questioning was done in a reasonably comfortable room. The quentioning room was not a tiny, uncomfortable room with a conspicuous window to allow employees in an adjacent room to look in. The investigator seemed to have common sense and a sincere desire to find out what had happened.
      Once in Santa Clara county jail, a C.O. was lying on his back on a floor. A prisoner was on him, punching his face. A second prisoner conspicuously stood nearby, silently watching. He was not the only witness-prisoner. C.O.s came, pulled the puncher off and took him away. As the prisoner-puncher was taken away, he briefly said the cause of the violence. That witness-prisoner continued to watch. No one ever asked that witness-prisoner anything about the prisoner-C.O. punching. If there was an investigation, that witness-prisoner was left out. Maybe none of the witness-prisoners were questioned. Even if there's not going to be a prosecution (a somewhat unlikely assumption when a C.O. is punched in the face by a prisoner), it's important to investigate violence in jail.
      It's better to be imprisoned in state prison, where the staff tries to investigate violence and reports of violence, rather than Santa Clara county jail, where investigations either are not done or are done amazingly incompetently.
    4. getting out early
      As far as we know, a Santa Clara county jail prisoner has to serve his full sentence in jail. By contrast, many prison prisoners get out of prison early on parole. Many prison prisoners work there. As far as we know, for every two days worked in prison, a prisoner gets out one day early. Many defendants, if told that many prison prisoners get back on the street without having to serve their full sentence in prison, would immediately ask their lawyer to try to arrange state prison time instead of county jail time. For many defendants (especially those with prior convictions), this consideration (getting back on the street as soon as possible) outweighs all other considerations.
    5. If a prisoner obeys the rules reasonably well, the state prison staff will probably be much less bad than Santa Clara county jail's staff. We don't know why this is so. Maybe the state legislature and governor are more sympathetic to prisonsers than is the county Board of Supervisors. Maybe the prison system is fussier about whom it hires, or trains and supervises better.
    6. hearings
      In Santa Clara County jail and in state prisons, there are prisoner hearings although the staff does not use the word "hearing". For example, the staff can conduct a hearing before punishing a prisoner or to allow a prisoner to explain why he should prevail on a grievance. In Santa Clara County jail, hearings are brief (a few minutes, several minutes), highly casual (an officer walks over to a prisoner and briefly discusses the matter as both people stand near each other), and can be held at any time. A state prison (as distinguished from county jail) hearing can be held as prisoner and officer sit at a table, allowing them to comfortably refer to any papers they have with them. Some prison hearings are conducted by an officer who is not part of the prison staff but comes from Sacramento for that hearing. A jail prisoner can be woken in the middle of the night, then immediately have a hearing (for example, be accused of something wrong and asked what his explanation is) as he stands sleepy beside his bed. As far as we know, state prisoners are never woken, then told that their hearing is now beginning.
      Once at a Santa Clara County jail middle-of-the-night hearing, the just-woken prisoner immediately objected to his hearing being in the middle of the night. A uniformed, white, male officer who was present (but not the white, female officer who was presiding) said with a straight face that they (there were a few officers present) thought that the prisoner would appreciate the time. The hearing was conducted while other prisoners slept nearby. Maybe the hearing woke some of them. The brief hearing ended without anyone saying to the prisoner that the hearing was over, that he was forbidden to speak any more, or that he could go back to sleep. The prisoner spoke. A uniformed staff member lifted the prisoner, then slammed him on a nearby, hard, wooden, horizontal surface. Later, the prisoner went to a jail doctor for back pain. We are not aware of anti-prisoner violence at state prison hearings. As far as we know, state prison hearings are not conducted in a prisoner's sleeping quarters. As far as we know, when a state prisoner is summoned to go to a hearing in his prison, the hearing is in a conference room or office.
      A flaw of both jail and prison hearings is lack of notice of when the eharing shall begin. Suddenly, prisoners are told that a hearing shall begin more or less immediately. When a prisoner is told is now going to begin, he can be far from his sleeping place, which is where the papers (for example, notes of applicable law) are that he intends to use at the hearing. Prisoners have no opportunity to get their hearing papers. Furthermore, prisoners have no oppurtunity to refresh their memories of what is in their notes. Prisoners should get at least three hours advance notice of when a hearing shall begin. For example, if a hearing shall begin at noon, the prisoner should be told not later than nine in the morning that he shall have a hearing at noon.
    7. A prisoner's life is immeasurably better if he has even one or two good friends while incarcerated. The more prisoners a prisoner meets, the more likely he is to meet prisoners with whom he'll become good friends. In jail, a prisoner can daily meet only a small number of prisoners (perhaps a few dozen who live in his pod or dormitory room). In state prison, he can daily meet more prisoners because there are hundreds who share his yard. Thus, a state prisoner is much more likely than a jail prisoner to meet prisoners who will become his good friends.
    8. Conceivably big city prisoners (for example, prisoners from San Jose, which has about six hundred thousand residents) are more vile and vicious than rural prisoners. Maybe the prison system has a higher proportion of rural prisoners than does the jail.
      There are rumors that state prison is more dangerous than Santa Clara county jail. We guess that the rumors are wrong. If the rumors are right, we guess that they are right chiefly for prison prisoners who are at high risk for violence, for example, prisoners who:
      1. are gang members. For example, if a Crip and a Blood sleep in the same room, they may fight each other.
      2. testified for the prosecution in a criminal court case or worked as an informant in prison
      3. are elected leaders of their race
      4. are classified as an MS (maximum security) prisoner. Some prisoners are considered to have a high probability of breaking important rules (for example, attacking other prisoners). Those prisoners are classified as MS. MS prisoners are housed together. MS prisoners are at high risk of being attacked by some of their fellow MS prisoners.
      Consider an NMF (non-medical fight: a fight between two prisoners in which neither requires medical care after the fight). In Santa Clara county jail, if C.O.s find out about an NMF, the usual reaction is to briefly chat about it as they might about a professioanl boxing bout: did either fighter show admirable skill?, who won?, and so forth. No written record is made. Usually, the prisoners are not separated from each other. Once, a C.O. and a prisoner walked through the jail together. A prisoner in a cell splashed a liquid onto the C.O. and prisoner walking by. Much more of the liquid landed on the C.O. than on the prisoner. The liquid smelled like urine. The two kept walking. They said nothing about what had happened except that the C.O. told the prisoner to submit a grievance about the incident. The prisoner obeyed. He submitted a grievance. Later, the prisoner asked what the jail's response was to the grievance. He was told that the staff had no record of any such grievance. In a prison (not jail), two prisoners had an NMF. They were immediately seaprated from each other so that they could not fight again. Soon after, one of them was transferred to anothe prison. These anecdotes are examples of an important difference between Santa Clara county jail and prison: prison does more than jail to try to prevent violence, jail does more than prison to prevent and destroy written evidence of violence. By the way, neither jail nor prison normally handles an NMF as a crime. If two free people seem to have an NMF, a police officer might give them a ticket or even arrest them for a misdemeanor. If two prisoners have an NMF, there will be no misdemeanor ticket, arrest, or prosecution.
      Consider an outstanding doctor practicing medicine in a rural village. He owns his practice. Owning his own practice is a nuisance. He likes to treat patients, not shop for insurance, collect bills from patients, or check references of job applicants. He doesn't make much money in his village. What's worse, the village's population is declining. His income is gradually declining. One day, he gets a letter from a hospital in a big city (maybe Houston or Chicago). The hospital offers him a job paying twice what he now earns. Furthermore, he'll just treat patients. It's unlikely that he'll write to the hospital that there's more violent crime in Chicago than in his village, and he doesn't want to be injured, so he's turning down the offer. If he turns down the offer, it won't be because he's concerned about being injured in Chicago because there's more violent crime there. Even if prison's more dangerous than jail, the difference is too small to justify missing the substantial benefits of prison.
  3. Sometimes a Santa Clara county prosecutor makes an offer: plead guilty to a crime and, in exchange, your sentence will be shorter and your time will be served in Santa Clara county jail rather than in prison. Most prisoners would be much better off doing their time in prison. Furthermore, for most prisoners with a clean record being prosecuted for a felony for the first time, almost all of the disadvantages of conviction occur after release from incarceration (so that reduction in the number of years of incarceration usually is only a trivial benefit). Therefore, many Santa Clara county criminal cases resolved by plea bargain should instead be resolved by trial. Criminal defense lawyers should not try to conceal the considerations stated above to try to trick defendant-clients in Santa Clara County into plea bargains.
court officer Douglas Blanchard Allen, California lawyer 99239. 2007apr13.
He was admittted to the bar in 1981. He may possibly live at one of the addresses below.
DOUGLAS B ALLEN Born 1953, 12468 BARLEY HILL RD, 08/14/2002, LOS ALTOS, CA 94024, (650) 949-0280
DOUGLAS B ALLEN Born 1953, 20150 THOMPSON RD, LOS GATOS, CA 95033.
2005 March 5, court officer (attorney at law) Gloria Allred was born Gloria Bloom on 3 July 1941 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. She is Gloria Rachel Allred, California lawyer number 65033, and may be:
GLORIA ALLRED, age 63, 17366 W SUNSET Boulevard (west of Arnold Schwarzenegger's Sunset Boulevard house), PACIFIC PALISADES CA 90272, (310);
GLORIA R. ALLRED, 1486 GLENDON Avenue, Westwood Village neighborhood, LOS ANGELES CA 90024, (310).
2004 December 3, attorney at law (lawyer)
Michael D. Amick
Michael Daniel Amick
California bar # 146009
county: Sacramento
Mastagni Holstedt & Amick
1912 I St #102
Sacramento, CA 95814
(916) 446-4692
born Boonville Missouri, 24 October 1944
MICHAEL D. AMICK, age 59, 8008 WHITE BIRCH Court (a lawyer who lives on a court), CITRUS HEIGHTS CA 95610, (916) 72?-????.
Lawyer Michael Amick sometimes may work in the law firm's Stockton office.
2004 December 3, attorney at law (lawyer)
Cynthia M. Bosco
Cynthia Marie Bosco
California bar # 200114
county: Sacramento
Dept Of Developmental Services Legal Affairs Div
1600 9th St Ste 240, Sacramento, CA 95814-6414
(916) 653-0123
cynthia.bosco@dds.ca.gov
CYNTHIA M BOSCO, age 41, 7555 GREENHAVEN DR, SACRAMENTO CA 95831, (916) 429-6352
born BOSCO CYNTHIA M 04/07/1963 FEMALE mother MCGERRIG, county SAN FRANCISCO
2004 December 3, attorney at law (lawyer)
Dawn M. Capp
California bar # 215169
county: Sacramento
Law Ofc Dawn Capp, P O Box 41045, Sacramento, CA 95842
(916) 332-2643
info@dawncapp.com
DAWN M CAPP, age 31, 1851 DONAX AVE, SAN DIEGO CA 92154, (619)
2004 December 3, attorney at law (lawyer)
John Patrick Carty III
California bar # 95725
county: San Joaquin
David Allen & Associates, 7400 Shoreline Dr #1 Stockton, CA 95219
(209) 473-4800
jcarty at davidallenlaw.com
JOHN P CARTY, age 49, 1160 RIO NORTE WAY, SACRAMENTO CA 95834, (916)
Cheung 2008aug18
Dona K Cheung, California lawyer 221222
1169 Parkington Ave., Sunnyvale, CA, 94087. (408) 605-5754.
Undergraduate School Univ of California Santa Cruz; CA. Law School U of San Francisco SOL; San Francisco CA. 12/5/2002 Admitted to The State Bar of California.
DONA CHEUNG (408) 245-8110
DONA K CHEUNG 1969-08-31 lived in Santa Cruz CA 95060.
Clark
2004 December 3, attorney at law (lawyer)
Kasey Christopher Clark
He seems to have works for Mastagni, Holstedt & Amick.
Kasey Christophe Clark
California bar # 148881
county: Sacramento
Cause Statewide Law Enforcement Assn.
2029 H St
Sacramento, CA 95814
(916) 447-5262
kclark@cause7.comÊ
KASEY C. CLARK, age 42, 4424 D ST, SACRAMENTO CA 95819, (916) 454-6166.
Recent neighbors may include William S Higgins (Attorney, League of California Cities; 511 La Purissima Way, Sacramento, CA 95819; 38.5735, -121.44541), Bruce Bikle (PROFESSOR, CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SACR; 5001 E St, Sacramento, CA 95819; 38.57386, -121.44628), Jerome Mcguire (Counsel, California State Senate; 561 La Purissima Way, Sacramento, CA 95819; 38.57299, -121.44566), Liberty Sanchez (Lobbyist, Law offices of Barry Broad; 800 46th St, Sacramento, CA 95819; 38.57256, -121.44456), Dr Errol A Craig (Resident Physician, UC Davis Medical Center; John Kerry $1,000; 4709 C St, Sacramento, CA 95819; 38.57438, -121.44178), Eugene Barasch (Md, UCD; 4225 E St, Sacramento, CA 95819; 38.57414, -121.44973), Connie Sanders Emerson (Attorney [although seemingly not according to state bar of California website], Lanahan & Reilley [closely linked to California assembleywoman Noreen Marie Evans]; 4465 G St; Sacramento, CA 95819; 38.57148, -121.44841), and Eileen Heaser (Librarian, CSUS; 449 San Miguel Way, Sacramento, CA 95819; 38.57552, -121.45112).
Cohn
Cindy Ann Cohn 2008aug14.
Court officer: attorney at law, California lawyer # 145997. Undergraduate School Univ of Iowa; Iowa City IA. Law School Univ of Michigan Law Sch; Ann Arbor MI.
```
federal campaign contribution

Cindy Cohn
Attorney 
Electronic Frontier Foundation
Updated 
Q1/2004 
John Kerry 
$500
4039 23RD ST
San Francisco CA
```
CINDY A COHN Born Nov 1963, 04/2001, 307 CHATTANOOGA ST, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94114 (415) 285-9088
CINDY A COHN 4039 23RD ST SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94114 (415) 648-4952
CINDY A COHN 04/2005, 4039 3RD ST SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94124
CINDY A COHN Born Nov 1963, 03/2002, 425 MISSISSIPPI ST SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94107 (415) 285-9088
CINDY A COHN 05/2003, 519 HICKORY ST SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102
Coliver 2008aug17
Lillian Sandra Coliver
Lillian Sandra Coliver, California lawyer 99492. Open Society Justice Initiative, 400 W 59th St., New York, NY, 10019; (212) 548-0384, Fax (212) 548-4662. Email scoliver at justiceinitiative.org. Undergraduate School Yale Univ; New Haven CT. Law School UC Berkeley SOL Boalt Hall; Berkeley CA 12/1/1981 Admitted to The State Bar of California.
```
Sandra Coliver
Attorney 
Open Society Institute
Updated 
Q1/2008 
$250
New York NY
Donation to Moveon.org Political Action
```
LILLIAN S COLIVER Born 1955, 305 13TH ST, NEW YORK, NY 10014
SANDRA COLIVER 45 CHRISTOPHER ST NEW YORK, NY 10014 (212) 217-1946
LILLIAN S COLIVER 1955-04-13 lived in Berkeley CA 94709.
Born COLIVER LILLIAN S 04 13 1955, mother SIMON, FEMALE, county SAN FRANCISCO.
de la Vega, Delavega 2008aug16
Connie de la Vega, Constance M. V. "Connie" DelaVega, California lawyer 85199
USF School of Law, 2130 Fulton St., San Francisco, CA, 94117. Undergraduate School Scripps Coll; Claremont CA. Law School UC Berkeley SOL Boalt Hall; Berkeley CA. 5/18/1979 Admitted to The State Bar of California.
CONNIE M DELAVEGA Born 1953, 3987 FOREST HILL AVE OAKLAND, CA 94602 (510) 482-3150
```
	 
CONSTANCE 	  	DELAVEGA born	1953-02-05 lived in 	Oakland 	CA 	94609.
 	 
CONSTANCE 	  	M DELAVEGA 	1953-02-05 	Oakland 	CA 	94602.

CONSTANCE 	  	M DELAVEGA 	1953-02-05 	Oakland 	CA 	94611.
```
Dixon
2004 December 3, attorney at law (lawyer)
Brian A. Dixon
Brian Albert Dixon
California bar # 139253
Mastagni Holstedt et al 1912 I St #102, Sacramento, CA 95814
(916) 446-4692
born Spokane Washington, 2 December 1957
BRIAN A DIXON, age 47, 3060 DONNER WAY (near Franklin Boulevard and 31st Street), SACRAMENTO CA 95817-3238 , (916)
2006 January 26, Paul Wesley EGLY, court officer (attorney).
He was a Los Angeles county Superior Court judge. He has practiced law in California and elsewhere.
California lawyer 23615
Address 339 Dartmoor, Laguna Beach, Orange county, CA 92651
telephone (949) 497-2027.
PAUL H EGLY, Born Dec 1920, 339 DARTMOOR ST. (between Laguna Coast Wilderness Park and the Pacific Ocean), LAGUNA BEACH, CA 92651-1428.
born EGLY PAUL W 03/09/1921 MALE, mother GANTCHY, county ORANGE
2004 December 3, attorney at law (lawyer)
Gregory S. Emery
Gregory Steven Emery
California bar # 91861
county: Placer
P O Box 4234
(916) 491-4279
GREGORY S EMERY, age 52, 10745 SUNRISERIDGE CIR, AUBURN CA 95603, (916)
2004 December 18, attorney at law (lawyer)
Diane M. Fishburn, Diane Maura Fishburn
bar association # 96812
admitted to bar: January 21, 1981
county: Sacramento
Olson Hagel & Fishburn LLP 555 Capitol Mall #1425 Sacramento, CA 95814-4602
(916) 442-2952
She worked for the California FPPC (Fair Political Practices Commission), CARB (California Air Resources Board), and New Mexico Supreme Court.
DIANE M. FISHBURN, age 50, 5391 MONALEE Avenue, SACRAMENTO CA 95819, (916) 454-5414
born FISHBURN DIANE M 05/18/1954 FEMALE, mother RODUNER county LOS ANGELES
Recent neighbors may include Catherine Warmerdam (Public Relations, Cal Poly Foundation; 451 Lovella Way, Sacramento, CA 95819; 38.5721, -121.4324), Steven Soto (MediCal Branch Chief, State of California; 5309 Callister Ave, Sacramento, CA 95819; 38.57814, -121.4342), Ms. Gail Shamberg (Registered Nurse, U C Davis Health Sys; 5621 McAdoo Ave, Sacramento, CA 95819; 38.57173, -121.4311), and Gary Hartsough (Air Traffic Controller, Federal Aviation Administration; 5516 Callister Ave, Sacramento, CA 95819; 38.57617, -121.42892).
2004 December 18, attorney at law (lawyer)
Leroy Y. Fong
bar association # 45161
admitted to bar: January 15, 1970
county: Sacramento
Olson Hagel & Fishburn LLP 555 Capitol Mall #1425 Sacramento, CA 95814-4602
(916) 442-2952
He was a Sacramento County DDA (Deputy District Attorney).
LEROY Y. FONG, age 66, 25 WATERCREST Court, SACRAMENTO CA 95831, (916) 421-1210
Recent neighbors may include Linda Berg (Attorney, State Of California; 7620 Windbridge Dr, Sacramento, CA 95831; 38.48421, -121.53416), Bryan Baldwin (Human Resources, California Department of Justice; 23 Fallwind Cir, Sacramento, CA 95831; 38.4856, -121.52304), and Nelson Chan (Attorney, State of California; 1060 E Landing Way , Sacramento, CA 95831; 38.47764, -121.52179).
2004 December 18, attorney at law (lawyer)
Elizabeth L. Gade, Elizabeth Louise Gade
bar association # 161495
admitted to bar: December 14, 1992
county: Sacramento
Olson Hagel & Fishburn LLP 555 Capitol Mall #1425 Sacramento, CA 95814-4602
(916) 442-2952
ELIZABETH L. GADE, age 41, 3970 BREUNER Avenue, SACRAMENTO CA 95819, (916)
Hoffman 2008aug18
Court officer Paul Hoffman, Paul Lindsey Hoffman, California lawyer 71244. Schonbrun DeSimone etal LLP, 723 Ocean Front Walk, Venice, CA, 90291, (310) 396-0731. Undergraduate School City Univ of New York - City College; New York NY. Law School New York Univ SOL; New York NY. 12/22/1976 Admitted to The State Bar of California.
Maybe PAUL L HOFFMAN Born Jul 1951, 1907 VALLEY PARK AVE, HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254.
Steven Jay Ipsen, court officer (attorney at law) 2008jun12
lawyer #126810. He was a board member of California's Bar Board of Governors (the agency which regulates California lawyers).
```
Work Address 	Office of the District Attorney
42011 4th St W, Ste 3
Lancaster, CA, 93534 	
Work Phone Number 	(661) 974-7775
County 	Los Angeles 	
Law School 	UCLA SOL; Los Angeles CA

12/11/1986 	became a California lawyer
```
STEVEN J IPSEN born 1961-04-12 may have been in Mission Hills CA 91345.
STEVEN J IPSEN Born 1962, 02/2003, 9345 SEPULVEDA BLVD NORTH HILLS, CA 91343.
STEVEN J IPSEN Born 1962, 07/2005, 32950 DEERGLEN LN, SANTA CLARITA, CA 91310.
2004 December 18, attorney at law (lawyer)
Bruce J. Hagel, Bruce Joseph Hagel
bar association # 63531
admitted to bar: January 10, 1975
county: Sacramento
Olson Hagel & Fishburn LLP 555 Capitol Mall #1425 Sacramento, CA 95814
(916) 442-2952
BRUCE J. HAGEL, age 55, 4015 CAPITOLA HILLS Court, FAIR OAKS CA 95628, (916)
born HAGEL BRUCE J 06/04/1949 MALE, mother HELLER, county MARIN
2004 December 3, attorney at law (lawyer)
Dennis Wayne Hargrave
California bar # 145618
county: Plumas
Law Offfice Of Dennis Hargrave, PO Box 825 Chester, CA 96020-0825
(530)258-2524
DENNIS W HARGRAVE, age 48, 8381 BULL MOUNTAIN CIR, ELK GROVE CA 95758, (916)
Heinen
2005 April 18, (mentioned in former URL news.com.com/Apples+head+lawyer+steps+down/2100-1047_3-6069881.html) Nancy Heinen, attorney at law. 2007apr24
Nancy Regina Heinen
415 Cervantes Road (between Shawnee Pass and Arapaho Court), Portola Valley CA 94028-7659, (415) 851-3051, (650) 851-5780.
email heinen@apple.com,
NANCY R. HEINEN, age 48, 415 CERVANTES ROAD, PORTOLA VALLEY CA 94028, (650);
NANCY HEINEN, REDWOOD CITY CA 94062, (650) 529-0646.
James Otto Heitling, president of the state bar of California 2005-2006, court officer (attorney at law), lawyer Number 68996, 2006may31.
JAMES O HEITING, 30453 AVENIDA PALMERA, HOMELAND, CA 92548
JAMES O HEITING Born 1972 31724 INDIAN SPRING RD LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92532.
JAMES O HEITING (909) 780-8579
JAMES O HEITING Born Mar 1972 15992 SUMMIT CREST DR RIVERSIDE, CA 92506 (951) 780-9726
JAMES O HEITING, 3845 MARKET ST 10/05/2004 RIVERSIDE, CA 92501 (909) 780-8579
JAMES O HEITING, 6090 LOOKOUT TER 04/15/2001 RIVERSIDE, CA 92505
JAMES O HEITING 3845 MARKET ST RIVERSIDE, CA 92501 (951) 780-8579
2004 December 3, attorney at law (lawyer)
John W. Hicks
John Walter Hicks
California bar # 212262
county: Sacramento
Stockwell Harris Widom & Woolverton, 1545 River Park Dr #330, Sacramento, CA 95815
(916) 924-1862
john_hicks@shww.com
JOHN W HICKS, 30, 3605 PULLMAN DR, SACRAMENTO CA 95827, (916)
2004 December 3, attorney at law (lawyer)
John R. Holstedt
John Richard Holstedt
California bar # 84142
county: Sacramento
Mastagni Holstedt et al 1912 I St #102 Sacramento, CA 95814
(916) 446-4692
born Cheyenne Wyoming, 24 November 1946
JOHN R HOLSTEDT, age 58, 4106 DENA WAY, SACRAMENTO CA 95821-3008, (916) 973-1087
9 January 2004
atorney at law (lawyer)
Robert Wells Jarvis
bar association # 34674
county: Sacramento
4720 American River Dr, Carmichael CA 95608
(916) 978-9563
email rwjarvis@aol.com
Harvard University Law School, Cambridge MA USA
ROBERT W. JARVIS, age 66, 4720 AMERICAN RIVER Drive, CARMICHAEL CA 95608, (916) 978956
court officer (attorney at law), 2005 July 18.
Kim, Christine Ms. Palos Verdes Estat, CA 90274.
She does not seem to be Christine S. Kim or C.S. Kim.
CHRISTINE KIM, 3604 NAVAJO PL., PALOS VERDES PENINSULA CA 90274, (310) 378-18nn.
Christine Kim, California attorney 170414.
Mount Holyoke College, Boston Univ law school.
2004 December 3, attorney at law (lawyer)
James D. Koontz
James Donald Koontz
California bar # 210092
county: Stanislaus
Griffith & Masuda, PO Box 510, Turlock, CA 95381-0510
(209) 667-5501
email: jkoontz at calwaterlaw.com
JAMES D KOONTZ, 2425 GREENBORO ST, TURLOCK CA 95382, (209) 634-9462

IMPORTANT NOTICE

This paladium.net Web site and all of its contents are provided as is, solely for informational purposes, and without warranty. There is no express warranty, no implied warranty, and no warranty of fitness for an intended purpose. We are not liable for informational errors or incompleteness. We have no duty to update anything. Verify all statements and claims. Carefully read and consider many sources of information, analysis, and opinion. Please inform us of each and every falsehood in this Web site. We own all email messsages and other communications to us. This Web site contains parody and humor. Our linking to a Web site is not approval or endorsement. This Web site, which is not exclusively about government officers, identifies some people who never were government officers. Our discussions and editorials do not necessarily apply to anyone named or identified in this Web site.

Home Addresses of People Most of Whom Are Current or Former Government Officers

LINKS

publicity about this site search this site an idea research tips

California main page previous page next page

*LINKS*
publicity about this site	search this site	an idea	research tips
California main page		previous page	next page

Referrer URL

map to CIA headquarters on Colonial Farm Road in McLean

link to home page