SM
SM
HOME ADDRESSES OF GERMAN GOVERNMENT OFFICERS
introduction
The editorials, opinions, and discussion in this Web site do not necessarily apply to anyone whose name or other information is provided in this Web site.
This page is not for DHL. We have a few pages just for DHL.
According to the U.S. state department, the Berlin senate persistently refuses to provide public law corporation status to JWs. More or less, this means that JWs couldn't get a nonprofit, religious corporation in Berlin.
As far as we know, BVDP were district authorities of the DVP in district cities (not mere towns) in East Germany, the DDR. DVP was the East German police (D=German, V=People, P=Police; police of the German people). There is a 79-page, 8.4 megabyte, Zipped (compressed), PDF file containing a list of some, supposed, former BDVP officers. The file has last name, first name, ID number, alternate ID number, job title, initial rank, office assignment, and rank now (at time list was made). Officers are listed by city. Within each city, officers are listed by their names. Click here to download..
By the way, in social conversation, some Germans who visited America in the last several yeas say that authorities in American airports act like VP (the DDR's DVP, police of the former East Germany). This is a criticism.
There is an article about Ex-Stasi, "Exklusiv: Tausende Ex-Stasi-Spitzel arbeiten im öffentlichen Dienst", by Stefan Tillmann and Monika Dunkel, 9 July 2009, Financial Times Deutschland. The Local summarized that article in English in "Municipal posts rife with 17,000 former Stasi workers", 9 July 2009.
The TOOOL website has an interesting video made in Berlin in 2005 which teaches about physical security of buildings; for example, some locks to avoid buying.
In an 18 January 2008 article entitled "Germany's Homegrown Intolerance", Spiegel Online's editor David Crossland briefly describes Germany's treatment of immigrants.
Wikileaks website links to a PDF file and DANIEL SCHMITT's discussion of that file. The file, also released by the German political party Pirate Party, contains two, scanned documents about supposed activities of the Bavarian police, Ministry of Justice and the Prosecution office in intercepting encrypted data sent via SSL or Skype via the Internet. The first document supposedly deals with splitting cost between Bavarian police and the prosecutors offices. The second document supposedly has the related, 4 September 2007 offer for software by a German company, Digitask. If we understand correctly, the technology works via a local installation of malware on a victim's computer. Digitask's offer gives a high-level explanation of this.
Please boycott Germany to the extent (if any) if it is legal and convenient for you to do so.
German professor Gerhard Schaefer was a federal High Court judge in Germany. His 2006, 170-page report to Germany's PKC (Parliamentary Control Committee) is described by "German secret service spies on journalists, employs Stasi methods", by Martin Kreickenbaum, 19 May 2006, in World Socialist Web Site. The report originally was available to the public with 11 pages missing. Those pages supposedly are at wikileaks.org/wiki/S7. That wikileaks.org/wiki/S7 link may not work in Germany. Those pages supposedly mention journalist Josef Hufelschulte (a seeming victim of the spying, whose code name supposedly was Jerez), the BND (Bundesnachrichtendienst, Germany's secret intelligence agency), BND superintendent Volker Foertsch, and Focus. We are under the impression that Focus is a magazine published by the British Broadcasting Corporation. The report describes illegal, covert action by the BND including much spying on journalists working for the news magazine Der Spiegel after the magazine had reported in 1995 on a plutonium deal set up by the BND.
As far as we know, the BND acted illegally, then illegally spied on the legal response, which was investigation by journalists.
The BND's covert action, including spying, seems to have had a few purposes; for example, to find out about Germany, especially German journalism (including legal, German, journalists' response to illegal BND activity); and to create desired publicity (which publicity was desired in part to try to influence German elections).
We are not expert about post-war Germany. The Schaefer report documents a period in which, despite normal BND policy to treat journalists better than other people, the BND treated journalists no better than ordinary Germans whom the BND was curious about. Therefore, we think that, to learn how the BND (and some other parts of the German government?) treat ordinary Germans whom it is curious about, read the Schaefer report. Schaefer reported a kind of infringement of privacy by the BND (spying on German journalists in violation of both the law and the BND's usual policy of treating journalists better than ordinary Germans). His report does not cover spying by other government agencies, businesses, and individuals.
By the way, a 16 November 2008 article, "German intelligence scrubs European records after Wikileaks exposure", describes massive deletion at RIPE to scrub references to a BND cover, an unregistered company at a Munich-based P.O. box.
The patient felt cold to the physician. We guess that the physician examined the patient in the patient's home.
The patient died soon after the incident. Would the patient have lived longer had she been correctly diagnosed? Did the physician do a crime (recklessly endanger his patient by the way he diagnosed her), causing the patient to die earlier than she would otherwise have died?
Each human will die. If Aaron killed Bob, this does not mean that Bob would have lived eternally but for Aaron's act. If Aaron killed Bob, this means that, because of Aaron's act, Bob died earlier than he otherwise have died. That's why we are curious if, had the old woman been correctly diagnosed (for example, discovered to be alive), she would have gotten appropriate medical treatment much earlier and therefore lived longer. We are curious if the doctor killed the old woman (by causing her to die earlier than she otherwise would have died) by incorrectly concluding that she was dead. If the doctor did kill, the killing would have been reckless, not intentional, we think. We do not know if anyone discussed with the old woman's family whether the doctor killed her (in other words: shortened her life by delaying appropriate medical treatment, by wrongly concluding that she was dead). There are two separate questions: could a doctor have cured the patient, did a doctor kill the patient. It is possible to kill a patient one is unable to cure. If one discusses with the family whether one could have cured the patient, this is not the same as discussing whether one killed (in other words, shortened the life of) the patient.
"Hospital pays damages for removing woman's healthy breast", 23 November 2009, The Local
2009nov25
What percent of German, medical laboratories' diagnoses are wrong? Is it negligent to make major medical decisions (for example, a decision to remove an entire breast) based solely on one laboratory's diagnosis? We ask if the practice (if relying solely on one laboratory's dignosis) is negligent, not if it is common.
"Schwarzfahrer in Uniform" (approximate translation: Black Rider in Uniform), 26 June 2009, stern.de Web site. Black riding is illegally riding without paying. As well as we understand the article, local police officers in uniform illegally ride first class on trains without paying, defying conductors, so a train company complained to a state government. A description in English of Stern's article is "Police under fire for taking first class train seats", 28 Jun 2009, thelocal.de Web site.
Germany has a small enclave in Switzerland: a part of Germany entirely surrounded by Switzerland. On school days, a school bus comes from Germany through Switzerland, picks up secondary school students in the enclave, delivers them to school in Germany, then later takes them through Switzerland back to their German enclave. German enclave phone numbers can be reached through both a German area code and a Swiss area code. We don't know if there are phone numbers elsewhere in the world which can be reached through more than one country's area code. We hope so because it seems convenient to the caller not to have to dial a country's country code. The call is slightly easier to dial if there is no country code.
Switzerland has a tiny enclave in Germany.
According to "Berliner ersteigert Straße in Brandenburg" (26. August 2009, by Axel Lier, Berliner Morgenpost Web site), Wassim Saab was the high bidder at an auction of a Brandenburg street (Brest district of Haversee) which he bought for only one thousand Euros. Before the auction, the city government refused to buy the street for one Euro. He now owns the street including, for example, street lamps and water conduits. We don't know his business plan for his street. He should be able to sell his street, which occupies 5200 square meters, for hundreds of thousands of Euros. Ordinarily (but not necessarily throughout Germany) when those conducting a public auction have a lawful intent, someone tries to attract as many bidders as he can to get as high an auction sale price as possible. We are impressed that there seem to have been only two bidders and that he high bid was only one thousand Euros. No one bidding for himself had been born in Germany, as far as we know. The sale seems to have been conducted indoors. Sometimes (not necessarily in Germany), government-conducted auctions are held outside in a highly public place; for example, on the steps in front of the main entrance of a courthouse, or on a sidewalk near an entrance to a government building. We guess that the buyer could have bought the street for less than one thousand Euros. We guess that he could have bought for 1.01 Euros (one Euro and one cent) or two Euros.
Residents of the street are concerned.
This street might be a tourist attraction while the new owner owns it. We don't know if it would be trespassing for tourists to walk or drive on his street. Perhaps someone would pay to name his street Coca Cola Street or Exxon Street. If his street were named South Exa Court, it would appear on street maps as "S EXA CT". On the north side of Hollywood Boulevard in the Hollywood neighborhood of Los Angeles City, there is a sidewalk near a movie theater. The sidewalk is made of poured concrete (not like German sidewalks, which typically are paved with brick or similar objects). The footprints and shoe prints of famous entertainers are in the concrete. Tourists come to look at or stand in the prints of stars.
According to an 11 Oct 2009 article at thelocal.de Web site entitled, "German army guns sold on Afghan black market":
"Hundreds of pistols from German army stocks have turned up for sale on the black market in Afghanistan and Pakistan, according to a Sunday report by North German Broadcasting (NDR)."In our opinion: this report, which we guess is true, illustrates one of the reasons why Afghanistan's quisling government cannot win despite extensive support from NATO and the UN.
Supposedly, the German government had sent the pistols to the Afghan military, which then had sent the guns to military and police units.
ANP (Afghanistan National Police) officers are extensively described on the Web (for example, in "Meet Afghanistan's model police force: inexperience, drugs and double agents", by Jon Boone and Peter Beaumont, 4 November 2009). According to those, extensive, Web descriptions, many ANP officers are corrupt, extort, use illegal drugs (for example, hashish), help the Taliban, have received little training, cannot read, and are inept at police work. Experts have called ANP a cesspool. One should be wary of training Afghan police. As an example of corruption, it supposedly is easy to obtain the release of prisoners of the ANP. One merely pays a bribe. It has been guessed that thirty percent of ANP officers illegally use drugs. The percentage varies by locality. It has been guessed that, in Helmand province, sixty percent of the police illegally use drugs. Money is extorted from civilians (for example, at ANP checkpoints).
In light of what we have read about Afghan police, it is unacceptably dangerous to the Afghan people to give pistols to Afghan police. In the Mexican city of Tijuana in January 2007, the national government took guns away from the local police because the police were unacceptably corrupt, especially in drug crimes. The police officers' union got them slingshots and ball bearings so that the officers could defend themselves, we read. The Afghan police should be disarmed, too. It is irresponsible to give them guns.
According to "Disagreements reign over how to end Afghan mission by 2011" (Sunday, 17 January 2010, thelocal.de), the German police union said that it was no longer certain the German police training mission in Afghanistan was helping. "We are training fighters for the Taliban," said Rainer Wendt, head of the union. "We are worried that many of the Afghan police candidates do not take up police duty after their training, but go direct to the Taliban. They pay twice as much."
Germany sent the pistols to the Afghan military. ANA (Afghan National Army) has widespread inefficiency, corruption, illiteracy, theft, lack of discipline, ghost soldiers (nonexistent soldiers whose pay is stolen by military insiders), desertion, and lack of aggression in combat (for example, failure to fire weapons at the enemy when fired at by the enemy).
The proportion of police officers who use pistols is much higher than the proportion of soldiers who use pistols. Because of extensive theft, sending pistols to the Afghan military or police is largely wasteful. For reasons briefly stated above, Afghan people need to be protected from the ANP.
We guess that helping the ANP may be illegal, perhaps even criminal if the helper knows about the extensive crime done by the ANP.
As far as we know, Islam prohibits Muslims from using intoxicants (for example, heroin and alcohol). Heroin is made from poppies. Most of the world's heroin comes from Afghan poppies. As far as we know, the heroin-poppy industry is Afghanistan's biggest industry. This industry violates Afghanistan's governmental law (the law of the U.N.-backed government) as well as Islam. The industry survives because of extensive corruption in the police, the military, and elsewhere in the government.
Our remarks above are narrowly about Afghanistan, and are chiefly based on many, credible reports on the Web.
In our opinion, there is more than one, independent reason why the U.N. and NATO lost and will not win in Afghanistan. One of those reasons is that U.S. ground forces (Army and Marine Corps) are much too small. When the Warsaw Pact invaded Czechoslovakia in 1968, the Pact's invasion force was at least 175,000 soldiers, perhaps as high as 500,000. Czechoslovakia had less area and fewer people than Afghanistan. America is unwilling to send enough soldiers and Marines to Afghanistan.
As the result of an order by KSK Task Force 47 colonel Georg Klein, there was a NATO massacre of Afghan people at two, fuel tanker trucks at the Kunduz River about seven kilometers southwest of Kunduz City at about 2:00 a.m. Afghani time on 4 September 2009. By GMT (an internationally used time system) and CET (German time), the massacre was on 3 September 2009.
According to the ICRS's "15-10-2009 Operational update":
An air strike on fuel tankers in Kunduz on 4 September caused a large number of civilian casualties. The ICRC immediately sent a medical team to support Kunduz provincial hospital. Other delegates spoke to families who were mourning their dead in nearby villages.The ICRC donated medical supplies to Istiqlal Hospital for the treatment of burn injuries caused by the Kunduz air strike of 4 September.
What events occurred and what is the best interpretation of those events? Regarding what events occurred, the only, detailed account we read is "Coverup of the German army's role in the Kunduz massacre continues", by Ulrich Rippert, 7 December 2009. According to "KSK special forces involved in Kunduz strike" (10 December 2909, thelocal.de Web site) and "Luftangriff von Kundus: Rot-Kreuz-Bericht belastet Guttenberg" (9 December 2009, stern.de Web site), the International Red Cross (ICRC) supposedly deems the Kunduz bombardment contrary to international law. In a report not available to the public, the NATO Inspector-General's staff supposedly wrote, more or less, that, in light of Klein's beliefs at the time he gave the order, the attack was appropriate. (According to the "Coverup" article cited above: Klein's pertinent beliefs were wrong and are not the correct criterion.) We think that KTG (German Defense Minister Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg) initially said that the air attack was militarily appropriate but he later backtracked on that statement. There are other reports; for example, by Klein and by military police. Wikileaks.org provides an approximately 4Mb PDF file of German-language, military documents which can be downloaded from a Web page entitled, "Close Air Support Kunduz: Untersuchungsbericht, Meldungen, Auswertungsgespraeche, September 2009".
This is not a subject we expertly know. There may be mistakes in our discussion. We think that Klein's order was to immediately drop six bombs on a pair of stolen, fuel tanker trucks (with no permission to pilot Dude to buzz civilians nearby so that they would flee before the bombing). One of the trucks was trapped in sand, unable to move. The Taliban was giving away fuel in the trucks, which is a reason why many civilians were near the trucks. Supposedly, NATO knew what was going on. NATO on the ground supposedly was watching the stolen trucks on TV as the result of airborne TV observation. Also, a confidential informant called his control about seven times that night to report what was happening with the triucks (for example, the location of the trucks and that fuel in them was being given to villagers). Pilot Dude obeyed Klein's order except that he dropped only two bombs, not six. Dude obediently did not buzz the civilians near the trucks before dropping the bombs, with the result that many civilians died or were injured.
We think, possibly wrongly, that Klein's order required, to be legal under the governing rules of engagement:
There must have been been a related, military engagement with the enemy prior to the bombing. According to the "Coverup" article cited above, there hadn't been a prior engagement.
There must have been a belief that the fuel trucks imminently would be used in an attack on Klein's unit or on other German forces. The direction in which the trucks had been driven before they stopped, that one of the trucks was stuck (far from German forces) in sand and the other truck stayed with the stuck one, and that the fuel in the trucks was being given away, combine to suggest that use of the trucks for imminet attack was unlikely (although we do not know if Klein knew all this). Klein's order was illegal if his purpose merely was to deprive the robbers of the two trucks they had stolen, or to prevent use of the trucks in an eventual attack.
Under German law, Germany is not at war in Afghanistan.
Much later, KTG fired Chief of Staff because (according to KTG) they concealed reports about the Kunduz massacre, an accusation the two men suppposedly deny, according to "Doubts emerge about army chief's sackings", 12 Dec 2009, thelocal.de Web site. Why would KTG's subordinates conceal massacre reports from him? Why would he lie that they did?
The UN authorized the ISAF (International Security Assistance Force) to conduct military action in Afghanistan. Pursuant to the Bonn Agreement, NATO manages the ISAF.
According to "Report says Bundeswehr lied during Kunduz strike"(23 December 2009, the local.de), the Frankfurter Rundschau reported that the German military deliberately misled the American fighter pilots at Kunduz. Citing a confidential investigation report by the ISAF, the paper reported that Bundeswehr Colonel Georg Klein's communications officer falsely claimed the German troops had "enemy contact" to justify the September 4 strike. According to the report, the officer, codenamed "Red Baron 21," was acting on instructions from Col. Georg Klein, who ordered the deadly air strike. Red Baron 21 knowingly misled the flight control center that was instructing the two F-15 fighters that carried out the attack, saying troops were in "immediate danger" in order "to make it possible for the mission to go ahead," the ISAF report said, according to the Frankfurter Rundschau (according to thelocal.de). No such enemy contact had taken place. Under ISAF rules, such an air strike can only go ahead if troops are under fire or immediately threatened. But at the time of the attack, the nearest German troops were nearly eight kilometers away in the Kunduz Bundeswehr field camp. If the report is correct, then the Germans breached the regulations, according to thelocal.de.
We don't know if the supposed lying was illegal or criminal. If a crime causes a death , is the actor guilty of a homicide crime? Should Red Baron (or Klein, who supervised him) be criminally prosecuted for a homicide crime in a court martial or a civilian court? Recall that Red Baron refused the pilot's request to buzz the trucks. (Der Spiegel says that (Der Spiegel says that it was Klein who refused.) Klein (or Red Baron, whom Klein supervised) may, we think, have breached ISAF protocol on air strikes for two reasons: he knew that no attack was imminent, and the request for buzzing the trucks was refused. The ISAF report, or the Rundschau's article about that report, is far more accurate than our account.
According to our understanding of news about that ISAF report: a German army officer illegally (perhaps criminally) lied to a pilot that an attack was imminent, and illegally refused to give the pilot permission to buzz the target before bombing. The result, which was forseeable, was that many, innocent civilians were burned alive and otehrs were injured. How did that differ from murdr? Later, accoding to the German defense minister, two, high-ranking defense ministry officers (one uniformed, one civilian) lied to conceal the matter from him. If news reports we read are correct, this may be a war crime or crime against humanity.
According to "Kunduz governor calls Bundeswehr 'ineffective'" (15 January 2010, the local.de), the governor of the northern Afghan province of Kunduz has called the German military's service there "ineffective" and said he would welcome more help from US troops. Mohammad Omar said that additional US forces would help ease the worsening security situation in the region. The German parliament doesn't want German soldiers to be killed when fighting insurgents" he said, adding that the improvements to the region were due only to US and Afghan operations, and the Bundeswehr should leave the job to more effective countries. If we correctly understand Omar, two of his points are:
We don't why the Bundeswehhr has a field camp in Northern Afghanistan, which happens to be a relatively safe part of the country.
Governor Omar defended the Bundeswehr's role in the controversial, 4 September 2009 air strike at the Kunduz River.
We are not expert in the massacre or in the military rules of engagement governing Klein's order to bomb the trucks. Our discussion, which relies largely on what we read on the Web, may have mistakes.
Dr. Gunter Pleuger, born in Wismar on 25 March 1941, spouse Mrs. Gabriella Mebus-Pleuger, children. When he lived in what seems to be the official residence of the German head of mission to the U.N., he may have been:
GUNTWER PLEUGER (The "w" Guntwer may be a clerical error), 5 East 74TH Street (near 5th Avenue), NEW YORK City, New York County, NY 10021, (212) 628-82nn. Block 1389, lot 7.
On about 14 June 1991, by deed DOCUMENT FT_1730000373773, the property (NEW YORK county block 1389, lot 7; 5 EAST 74 STREET) was acquired by BUNDERSREPUBLIK ETC at address EBERHARD ROHM, 345 PARK AVE, NY, NY 10154. On about 21 June 1991, "ROHM, EBERHARD" became the attorney of "BUNDESREPUBLIK DEUTSCHLA" by power of attorney DOCUMENT FT_1740000373774, according to New York city's acris.com website. That document applies to block 1389, lot 7 (5 EAST 74 STREET). People named "Eberhard Rohm" seem to have been a Manhattan lawyer (with Donahue & Partners corporate law firm and Jaworski law firm), a corporate lawyer in Germany, and an author of books such as Juden, Christen, Deutsche, 1933-1945, January 2004, ISBN 3766831763. Rohm may have a duaghter who's an American, television actress.
Recent neighbors may include:
The German governmetn may own real estate in Maryland, too. See the entry below for CHRISTOPH EICHHORN, 6609 RADNOR RD, BETHESDA, Montgomery county, MD 20817-6324.
NEVADA LAS VEGAS (HC). 4815 W. RUSSELL RD., SUITE 10J, 89118. MR. ANDREAS ROLF ADRIAN, HONORARY CONSUL Apr. 17, 2007
ANDREAS R ADRIAN Born Apr 1964, 1350 FLAMINGO RD 03/01/2006 LAS VEGAS, NV 89119
ANDREAS R ADRIAN 7755 COLEY AVE 09/01/2005 LAS VEGAS, NV 89117
PENNSYLVANIA PHILADELPHIA (HC). 1600 JOHN F. KENNEDY BL., SUITE 200, 19103 (215) 568-5573. MS. BARBARA AFANASSIEV, HONORARY CONSUL Feb. 21, 2002
BARBARA L AFANASSIEV 924 WAYLAND CIR 01/25/2002 BENSALEM, PA 19020 (215) 245-0200
BARBARA L AFANASSIEV 9964 LACKLAND DR 10/07/2004 PHILADELPHIA, PA 19114
MS. UTE AVERESCH, VICE CONSUL Jul. 18, 2002
UTE AVERESCH 2600 BUCHANAN ST SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94115 (415) 931-0537
MINNESOTA MINNEAPOLIS (HC). 1000 LASALLE AV., 55403-2205. (651) 962-4000. DR. HEINO A. P. BECKMANN, HONORARY CONSUL Dec. 18, 1996.
HEINO A BECKMANN Born Jun 1940, 19 1ST ST, 10/13/2003 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 (952) 929-2861
(952) 929-2861 HEINO BECKMANN 5232 56TH ST MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55436 (952) 929-4696
TENNESSEE NASHVILLE (HC). Hubbard, Berry & Harris; 201 4TH AV., N, SUITE 1420, 37219. (615) 251-5444. MR. DOUGLAS BERRY, HONORARY CONSUL Oct. 19, 2004
He has been City Attorney of Franklin City. Born 1952 Nashville.
DOUGLAS B BERRY Born 1952 3826 WHITLAND AVE NASHVILLE, TN 37205 (615) 269-0287
4 November 2005.
NIKOLAUS BESTE,
13330 DEERBROOK DR. (near Farmbrooke Lane),
POTOMAC, Montgomery county, MD 20854-6367, (301) 217-0814. District 04, Account Number 03021098, residential standard unit, frame exterior, July 2005 value about $724k.
Recent neighbors may have included:
MARK C BLACKWELL Born May 1949, 11206 BODLEY DR LOUISVILLE, KY 40223. (502) 244-1536.
BERNHARD J BLEISE, 1 EUDORA ST 01/25/2002 DENVER, CO 80246 (303) 322-0632
BERNHARD J BLEISE, 1590 FILBERT CT 04/15/2001 DENVER, CO 80220 (303) 322-0632
BERNHARD J BLEISE Born Apr 1953, 621 17TH ST 10/13/2003 DENVER, CO 80293 (303) 292-5922. This seems to be the consular address.
MR. MANFRED JOSEF KARL BLESS; MRS. MARTHA KOPP BLESS, Minister-COUNSELOR (POLITICAL)
MANFRED BLESS, 10809 BRICKYARD CT POTOMAC, MD 20854 (301) 299-2654
MANFRED J BLESS Born Feb 1949, 1625 INTERNATIONAL DR 01/28/2002 MC LEAN, VA 22102
Recent neighbors may have included:
DR. AXEL BREE, SECOND SECRETARY (ECONOMIC)
AXEL BREE, 4717 YUMA ST NW 11/12/1999 WASHINGTON, DC 20016 (202) 966-3852.
Recent neighbors may include:
Recent neighbors may have inlcuded:
Texas SAN ANTONIO (HC). 310 S. ST. MARY'S ., 78205. (210) 226-1788. MR. BERNARD JOHN BUECKER, HONORARY CONSUL Feb. 22, 2001. 2008jan11.
(210) 828-0594 BERNARD J BUECKER Born Sep 1945, 463 OLMOS DR SAN ANTONIO, TX 78212 (210) 828-7350
MR. STEFAN BUSCH, CONSULAR AGENT Sep. 14, 2004
STEFAN BUSCH, 3436 CLAY ST 05/01/2006 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94118 (415) 440-0407
Recent neighbors may include:
MR. HANS JOACHIM CORDES THIRD SECRETARY
He may have lived in northern California.
JOACHIM CORDES 5609 19TH ST N ARLINGTON, VA 22205 (703) 241-1304
UTAH SALT LAKE CITY (HC). 60 E. SOUTH TEMPLE, SUITE 1800, 84111. (801) 321-4807. MR. CHARLES WINSTON, II DAHLQUIST, HONORARY CONSUL Dec. 20, 1999
CHARLES W DAHLQUIST Born Aug 1947, 10312 VILAS DR 03/01/2006 SANDY, UT 84092 (801) 944-8254
MR. HANSJOERG DENG, VICE CONSUL Aug. 29, 2003
HANSJOERG DENG, 882 CLEVELAND ST OAKLAND, CA 94606 (415) 626-8775.
Recent neighbors may include:
MRS. STEFANIE ELISABETH DEHNER, VICE CONSUL Aug. 24, 2005.
STEFANIE DEHNER 1 CENTURY LN MIAMI BEACH, FL 33139 (305) 674-1596
MRS. ALEXANDRA DILSKY; MR. HOLGER FABIG THIRD SECRETARY
ALEXANDRA I DILSKY, 4215 49TH ST NW WASHINGTON, DC 20016
ALEXANDRA I DILSKY 4933 CRESCENT ST 01/01/2006 BETHESDA, MD 20816 (301) 229-4241
MR. RALPH DOERMANN; MRS. INA WILL DOERMANN, COUNSELOR (CUSTOMS)
RALPH DOERMANN 11200 POWDER HORN DR POTOMAC, MD 20854 (301) 983-5858
MRS. ANGELIKA DRESEN, VICE CONSUL Jun. 27, 2005
ANGELIKA DRESEN 414 HARPER AVE LOS ANGELES, CA 90048 (323) 782-8565
MR. THOMAS CHRISTIAN ECKERT; MRS. CAROLINE GHISLAINE ECKERT, FIRST SECRETARY (POLITICAL)
THOMAS C ECKERT Born Jun 1943 504 TANEY AVE 09/13/2003 BROOKLYN, MD 21225 (410) 636-3988, (410) 789-2063. There is a Brooklyn in Maryland.
THOMAS C ECKERT, 1 JAKES LN 08/16/2003 PASADENA, MD 21122. There is a Pasadena in Maryland.
THOMAS C ECKERT 1943-06-15. Brooklyn MD 21225 THOMAS C ECKERT 1943-06-15. Linthicum Heights MD 21090
Recent neighbors may include Mr. Michael Hutchinson (Economist, U.S. Dept Of Commerc; 9100 Town Gate Ln, West Bethesda, MD 20817; 38.98714, -77.18725).
MR. HARALD EHLICH; MRS. BIRGITT SCHWEIZER THIRD SECRETARY (ADMINISTRATIVE)
Maybe H EHLICH 7522 ELMORE LN BETHESDA, MD 20817 (301) 320-3865
It's interesting that the German government seems to own a one-family house, with owner's mailing address at the German embassy in the District of Columbia, in Maryland. We guess that the German government owns the home of the German ambassador to the U.S. although that home is not necessarily at this address.
Recent neighbors may include:
ULRICH EITNER, 2 WILLOW GATE CT (east of Tournament Players Club at Avenal), BETHESDA, Montgomery county, MD 20817-4110 , (301) 365-8473.
An irregularly shaped parcel, district 10, account number 02524005, built 1987, enclosed area 3,524 SF, total area 12,167.00 SF, 2 Stories, Basement, BRICK, one-family residence, sold in 1987 (new?) for $510k.
Recent neighbors may include Joram Piatigorsky (Research Scientist, Natl Inst of Health; John Kerry $1,000; 8435 Persimmon Tree Rd, Bethesda, MD 20817; 38.99656, -77.18715).
The following person was recently (about 2004), according to campaign finance records, at the same, one-family house: Ms. Nancy Rubin (Envoy [retired ambasssador to the U.N. Commission for Human Rights], U.N. Commerce; DNC $25,000 [Is this payment the kind of conduct which resulted in her ambassadorship?]; 3035 Chain Bridge Rd NW, Washington, DC 20016; 38.92477, -77.09745. Recent neighbors may have included Mr. Krit Kunplin (Broadcaster, U.S. Federal Government; 2806 Battery Pl N W , Washington, DC 20016; 38.92546, -77.09785).
Recent neighbors may include:
DR. JOERG FRIEDRICH; MRS. GABRIELE FRIEDRICH. ASST. MILITARY ATTACHE
JOERG FRIEDRICH, 5321 WAKEFIELD RD. (southeast of Little Falls Park), BETHESDA, Montgomery county, MD 20816-2841, (301) 347-9380.
He lives about 23 minutes or 16.53 miles from the GMR office (German Military Representative, 11150 Sunrise Valley Dr., Reston, VA 20191-4332). He lives about 13 minutes or 4.16 miles from the German embassy in the District.
District 07, Account Number 00563277, owner's address is in London England, RESIDENCE built in 1940, enclosed area 1,952 SF, parcel total area 5,250.00 SF, 2 stories, Basement, one-family house, brick exterior, sold in 1998 for $221,000. A rectangular parcel on the southeast side of Wakefield Road.
Recent neighbors may include:
MRS. MARION FUSS; MR. HANS JOSEF FUSS ASST. ATTACHE (DEFENSE)
MARION FUSS, 1103 SHARON CT 09/01/2005 MCLEAN, VA 22101-2115. (703) 790-1221. At Bright Avenue, near Dead Run Drive. This is about 4 miles from the McLean address we have for the HUELZs.
This also is about 15 minutes or 10.00 miles driving from the GMR (German Military Representative, 11150 Sunrise Valley Dr., Reston, VA 20191-4332). CIA headquarters are in McLean.
This paladium.net Web site and all of its contents are provided as is, solely for informational purposes, and without warranty. There is no express warranty, no implied warranty, and no warranty of fitness for an intended purpose. We are not liable for informational errors or incompleteness. We have no duty to update anything. Verify all statements and claims. Carefully read and consider many sources of information, analysis, and opinion. Please inform us of each and every falsehood in this Web site. We own all email messsages and other communications to us. This Web site contains parody and humor. Our linking to a Web site is not approval or endorsement. This Web site, which is not exclusively about government officers, identifies some people who never were government officers. Our discussions and editorials do not necessarily apply to anyone named or identified in this Web site.
Home Addresses of People Most of Whom Are Current or Former Government Officers
| |||
|---|---|---|---|
| publicity about this site | search this site | an idea | research tips |
| world's governments main page | previous page | next page | |
